mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reward-Respecting Subtasks for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2202.03466 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To achieve the ambitious goals of artificial intelligence, reinforcement learning must include planning with a model of the world that is abstract in state and time. Deep learning has made progress with state abstraction, but temporal abstraction has rarely been used, despite extensively developed theory based on the options framework. One reason for this is that the space of possible options is immense, and the methods previously proposed for option discovery do not take into account how the option models will be used in planning. Options are typically discovered by posing subsidiary tasks, such as reaching a bottleneck state or maximizing the cumulative sum of a sensory signal other than reward. Each subtask is solved to produce an option, and then a model of the option is learned and made available to the planning process. In most previous work, the subtasks ignore the reward on the original problem, whereas we propose subtasks that use the original reward plus a bonus based on a feature of the state at the time the option terminates. We show that option models obtained from such reward-respecting subtasks are much more likely to be useful in planning than eigenoptions, shortest path options based on bottleneck states, or reward-respecting options generated by the option-critic. Reward respecting subtasks strongly constrain the space of options and thereby also provide a partial solution to the problem of option discovery. Finally, we show how values, policies, options, and models can all be learned online and off-policy using standard algorithms and general value functions.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2022.

Builds on

9 of 42 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 734
  2. 2016The Option-Critic Architecturecited by 433
  3. 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 400
  4. 2017A Laplacian Framework for Option Discovery in Reinforcement Learningcited by 108
  5. 2017Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representationcited by 85
  6. 2017When Waiting is not an Option : Learning Options with a Deliberation Costcited by 57
  7. 2013Active Learning of Inverse Models with Intrinsically Motivated Goal Exploration in Robotscited by 56
  8. 2021Temporal Abstraction in Reinforcement Learning with the Successor Representationcited by 52
  9. 2019Planning with Expectation Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: