mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AI Assurance: A Comprehensive Testing Strategy for Enterprise AI Systems

arXiv 2605.23459 ↗First posted 22 May 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise AI systems, built on large language models, retrieval pipelines and autonomous agents, introduce a class of risks that traditional software quality assurance was never designed to address. These systems are probabilistic, context-sensitive and emergent: they cannot be verified to be correct in the classical sense, but only evaluated with increasing confidence. This paper presents a comprehensive assurance strategy for enterprise AI systems built around three key principles: first, that AI testing should focus on continuous risk reduction rather than strict correctness verification; second, that evaluation must be treated as a core engineering discipline alongside development; and third, that failures in AI assurance can lead to organizational impacts that are fundamentally different from those seen in traditional deterministic software systems. We introduce a structured AI Failure Taxonomy, propose a revised five-layer AI Assurance Pyramid and provide operational guidance on evaluation-driven development, RAG system testing, model lifecycle management and governance. The goal is to equip engineering leaders and practitioners with a strategy that is both philosophically grounded and operationally deployable.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.

Builds on

1 of 10 references.

References · 1

  1. 2024Evaluation-Driven Development and Operations of LLM Agents: A Process Model and Reference Architecturecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reliability Engineering for AI Systems: Challenges, Methods, and Directions
  2. 2026A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Quality Assurance Practices and Gaps in AI Agents
  3. 2026Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems
  4. 2026The Rise of Agentic Testing: Multi-Agent Systems for Robust Software Quality Assurance
  5. 2025Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systems
  6. 2026Continuous Process-Level Evaluation for Evolving Enterprise AI Agent Skills
  7. 2026Risk Architecture for AI-Native Engineering Teams: An Organizational Framework for Agentic System Governance
  8. 2026A Trace-Based Assurance Framework for Agentic AI Orchestration: Contracts, Testing, and Governance