mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Disentanglement Beyond Generative Models with Riemannian ICA

arXiv 2605.22531 ↗First posted 21 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is a gap between the theoretical foundations of disentanglement and the practice of modern representation learning. Existing theoretical frameworks, particularly Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and its nonlinear variants, assume a generative model with statistically independent latent variables underlying the data so that disentanglement amounts to identifying the latents that could have generated the data. This generative framework is interpretable and theoretically justified, but its strong assumptions make it difficult to apply to modern representation learning. Modern pretrained encoders often learn features that exhibit disentangled properties without making generative assumptions, yet there is no general theory for interpreting these features as independent factors of variation. We take a step toward such a theory by introducing Riemannian ICA (RICA), which replaces ICA's global generative model with local geometric structure. RICA is founded on the observation that in ICA, the factors of variation underlying a data point can be understood through radial curves emanating from the point that map to axis-aligned lines in the latent space. We formalize this perspective using Riemannian geometry and introduce our theory in a way that is consistent with the existing generative approach. Our main contribution is the disentanglement tensor, which encodes a second-order notion of disentanglement that we call pointwise disentanglement. This tensor depends on the Hessian of the data log likelihood as well as the Ricci curvature induced by the model. In a controlled source recovery setting with known ground-truth sources, RICA recovers sources across several manifolds, while the success of ICA baselines depends on the coordinates used to represent the observations. Our work provides a theoretical basis for studying local disentanglement without assuming a global generative model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.

Builds on

48 of 88 references.

References · 48

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  4. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  5. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  6. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  7. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  8. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  9. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
  10. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  11. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  12. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 860
36 more
  1. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  2. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 616
  3. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
  4. 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 335
  5. 2020StyleSpace Analysis: Disentangled Controls for StyleGAN Image Generationcited by 332
  6. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 296
  7. 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 282
  8. 2023Flow Matching on General Geometriescited by 265
  9. 2017Variational Inference of Disentangled Latent Concepts from Unlabeled Observationscited by 241
  10. 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
  11. 2017Latent Space Oddity: on the Curvature of Deep Generative Modelscited by 174
  12. 2021Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity Regularization: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICAcited by 160
  13. 2021Equinox: neural networks in JAX via callable PyTrees and filtered transformationscited by 148
  14. 2022Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 112
  15. 2018Robustly Disentangled Causal Mechanisms: Validating Deep Representations for Interventional Robustnesscited by 108
  16. 2021Independent mechanism analysis, a new concept?cited by 97
  17. 2023Learning Linear Causal Representations from Interventions under General Nonlinear Mixingcited by 92
  18. 2022On the Identifiability of Nonlinear ICA: Sparsity and Beyondcited by 85
  19. 2016Normalizing Flows on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 68
  20. 2022Function Classes for Identifiable Nonlinear Independent Component Analysiscited by 53
  21. 2020A Sober Look at the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations and their Evaluationcited by 52
  22. 2023Nonlinear Independent Component Analysis for Principled Disentanglement in Unsupervised Deep Learningcited by 48
  23. 2024InfoNCE: Identifying the Gap Between Theory and Practicecited by 40
  24. 2019Symmetry-Based Disentangled Representation Learning requires Interaction with Environmentscited by 35
  25. 2022Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysiscited by 28
  26. 2024Disentangling Dense Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 23
  27. 2024Towards Latent Masked Image Modeling for Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 20
  28. 2024Interaction Asymmetry: A General Principle for Learning Composable Abstractionscited by 20
  29. 2025A Review on Riemannian Metric Learning: Closer to You than You Imaginecited by 13
  30. 2025Gaussian Embeddings: How JEPAs Secretly Learn Your Data Densitycited by 13
  31. 2022Lagrangian Manifold Monte Carlo on Monge Patchescited by 11
  32. 2025From Isolation to Entanglement: When Do Interpretability Methods Identify and Disentangle Known Concepts?cited by 7
  33. 2026Computing Diffusion Geometrycited by 7
  34. 2019Mixture Probabilistic Principal Geodesic Analysiscited by 4
  35. 2025Mechanistic Independence: A Principle for Identifiable Disentangled Representationscited by 3
  36. 2025Geodesic Slice Sampler for Multimodal Distributions with Strong Curvaturecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.