The Signal in the Noise: OOD Detection Through Goodness-of-Fit Testing in Factorised Latent Spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep generative models offer a natural foundation for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, yet prior work has shown that their assigned likelihoods are notoriously unreliable indicators for in- vs out-of-distribution data. In this paper, we address this problem by leveraging the diffeomorphic and mass-preserving properties of continuous normalising flows. Our analysis shows that OOD samples are mapped to noise samples that are highly atypical under the noise prior in ways not captured by the likelihood. Based on this observation, we propose a new method -- Signal in the Noise (SITN) -- for OOD detection on the single-sample level. SITN requires no access to OOD data, incurs minimal computational overhead, and provides strict control of false positive rates. Comprehensive evaluations through standard benchmarks and synthetic perturbations highlight the method's effectiveness and the absence of the complexity bias inherent to likelihood-based methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.
Builds on
22 of 30 references.
References · 22
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 453
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2024Flow Matching Guide and Codecited by 301
- 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 221
10 more
- 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2021Understanding Failures in Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Generative Modelscited by 89
- 2020Density of States Estimation for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 74
- 2020Understanding Anomaly Detection with Deep Invertible Networks through Hierarchies of Distributions and Featurescited by 64
- 2021Hierarchical VAEs Know What They Don't Knowcited by 58
- 2024A Geometric Explanation of the Likelihood OOD Detection Paradoxcited by 22
- 2024Out-of-Distribution Detection with a Single Unconditional Diffusion Modelcited by 22
- 2022Testing Independence of Exchangeable Random Variablescited by 2
- 2026The Amazing Stability of Flow Matchingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.