A2QTGN: Adaptive Amplitude Quantum-Integrated Temporal Graph Network for Dynamic Link Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dynamic link prediction is important for modeling evolving interactions in social, communication, financial, and transportation networks. Classical temporal graph models capture changes over time, but they may struggle to represent rapidly evolving node-edge interactions in large dynamic graphs. We propose A2QTGN (Adaptive Amplitude Quantum-Integrated Temporal Graph Network), a hybrid quantum-classical framework that introduces adaptive amplitude encoding as a temporal embedding layer within a Temporal Graph Network. Unlike fixed quantum embeddings, the proposed module maps temporally varying node features into quantum states and selectively refreshes their amplitude representations according to the magnitude of feature change. This allows the framework to preserve stable node information, emphasize meaningful temporal variations, and reduce redundant quantum re-encoding. Across five Temporal Graph Benchmark datasets, A2QTGN achieves test area under the curve (AUC) values of up to 0.9957 and mean reciprocal rank (MRR) values of up to 0.7832, including the highest MRR among the compared baselines on tgbl-review and tgbl-flight. Ablation results further show that the adaptive quantum embedding is central to the model performance: on a 25k-event subset of tgbl-wiki, it improves test accuracy by 13.36 percentage points over always updating and by 22.44 percentage points over using no updates. The trained model is also evaluated using noisy simulations based on an IBM quantum device, followed by a smaller real-device experiment. The results show that adaptive quantum embeddings can provide effective temporal representations for dynamic link prediction while remaining executable under current quantum hardware constraints.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.
Builds on
24 of 35 references.
References · 24
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 902
- 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 898
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 530
- 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 462
- 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 448
- 2019Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Surveycited by 265
- 2019Inductive Relation Prediction by Subgraph Reasoningcited by 239
- 2021Inductive Representation Learning in Temporal Networks via Causal Anonymous Walkscited by 193
- 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 157
- 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 143
12 more
- 2020Foundations and modelling of dynamic networks using Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: A surveycited by 124
- 2022Towards Better Evaluation for Dynamic Link Predictioncited by 122
- 2022Provably expressive temporal graph networkscited by 56
- 2022Neighborhood-aware Scalable Temporal Network Representation Learningcited by 54
- 2024TGB 2.0: A Benchmark for Learning on Temporal Knowledge Graphs and Heterogeneous Graphscited by 36
- 2019Stacking Models for Nearly Optimal Link Prediction in Complex Networkscited by 35
- 2023Financial Fraud Detection using Quantum Graph Neural Networkscited by 35
- 2021Quantum Link Prediction in Complex Networkscited by 5
- 2025Evaluating Angle and Amplitude Encoding Strategies for Variational Quantum Machine Learning: their impact on model's accuracycited by 3
- 2024MiNT: Multi-Network Training for Transfer Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 2
- 2024Improving link prediction accuracy of network embedding algorithms via rich node attribute informationcited by 1
- 2026How Embeddings Shape Graph Neural Networks: Classical vs Quantum-Oriented Node Representationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.