mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Angle and Amplitude Encoding Strategies for Variational Quantum Machine Learning: their impact on model's accuracy

arXiv 2508.00768 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in Quantum Computing and Machine Learning have increased attention to Quantum Machine Learning (QML), which aims to develop machine learning models by exploiting the quantum computing paradigm. One of the widely used models in this area is the Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC), a hybrid model where the quantum circuit handles data inference while classical optimization adjusts the parameters of the circuit. The quantum circuit consists of an encoding layer, which loads data into the circuit, and a template circuit, known as the ansatz, responsible for processing the data. This work involves performing an analysis by considering both Amplitude- and Angle-encoding models, and examining how the type of rotational gate applied affects the classification performance of the model. This comparison is carried out by training the different models on two datasets, Wine and Diabetes, and evaluating their performance. The study demonstrates that, under identical model topologies, the difference in accuracy between the best and worst models ranges from 10% to 30%, with differences reaching up to 41%. Moreover, the results highlight how the choice of rotational gates used in encoding can significantly impact the model's classification performance. The findings confirm that the embedding represents a hyperparameter for VQC models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2025.

Builds on

12 of 54 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 692
  3. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
  4. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 326
  5. 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 203
  6. 2017Quantum machine learning: a classical perspectivecited by 95
  7. 2023Let Quantum Neural Networks Choose Their Own Frequenciescited by 22
  8. 2024Quantum Kernel Methods under Scrutiny: A Benchmarking Studycited by 22
  9. 2022Quantum Machine Learning Framework for Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery: a Prospective Quantum Advantagecited by 18
  10. 2022Quantum-classical convolutional neural networks in radiological image classificationcited by 15
  11. 2024Quantum Hamiltonian Embedding of Images for Data Reuploading Classifierscited by 4
  12. 2021Path Planning for Cellular-Connected UAV: A DRL Solution with Quantum-Inspired Experience Replaycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.