mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

You Only Need Minimal RLVR Training: Extrapolating LLMs via Rank-1 Trajectories

arXiv 2605.21468 ↗First posted 20 May 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a dominant paradigm for improving reasoning in large language models (LLMs), yet the underlying geometry of the resulting parameter trajectories remains underexplored. In this work, we demonstrate that RLVR weight trajectories are extremely low-rank and highly predictable. Specifically, we find that the majority of downstream performance gains are captured by a rank-1 approximation of the parameter deltas, where the magnitude of this projection evolves near-linearly with training steps. Motivated by this, we propose a simple and compute-efficient method RELEX (REinforcement Learning EXtrapolation), which estimates the rank-1 subspace from a short observation window and extrapolates future checkpoints via linear regression, with no learned model required. Across three models (i.e., Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, Qwen3-4B-Base, and Qwen3-8B-Base), RELEX produces checkpoints that match or exceed RLVR performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks, requiring as few as 15% steps of full RLVR training. Remarkably, RELEX is able to extrapolate far beyond the observation window at no training cost, predicting checkpoints up to 10-20× beyond the observed prefix with continued improvement (e.g., observe only the first 50 steps and extrapolate to 1000 steps). Our ablation analysis confirms the minimalist sufficiency of RELEX: neither increasing the subspace rank nor employing non-linear modeling yields further gains in extrapolation. Finally, we show that RELEX's success stems from a "denoising" effect: by projecting updates onto the rank-1 subspace, the model discards stochastic optimization noise that would otherwise degrade performance during extrapolation. Our code is available at https://github.com/weizhepei/RELEX.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026On the Implicit Reward Overfitting and the Low-rank Dynamics in RLVR7 May
  2. 2026On the Emergence of Implicit Curriculum in RLVR Learning Dynamics16 Feb
  3. 2025The Path Not Taken: RLVR Provably Learns Off the Principals11 Nov
  4. 2025On Predictability of Reinforcement Learning Dynamics for Large Language Models1 Oct
  5. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning2 Jun
  6. 2025ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models30 May
  7. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
  8. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training22 Nov

Other references · 20

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  6. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  7. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  8. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
  9. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
  10. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  11. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  12. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 370
8 more
  1. 2023LoraHub: Efficient Cross-Task Generalization via Dynamic LoRA Compositioncited by 364
  2. 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 176
  3. 2026Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMscited by 137
  4. 2025Reinforcement Learning Finetunes Small Subnetworks in Large Language Modelscited by 49
  5. 2024Model Extrapolation Expedites Alignmentcited by 37
  6. 2025Generative Modeling of Weights: Generalization or Memorization?cited by 14
  7. 2025WeightFlow: Learning Stochastic Dynamics via Evolving Weight of Neural Networkcited by 4
  8. 2026Low-rank Optimization Trajectories Modeling for LLM RLVR Accelerationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Linear Dynamics in the RLVR Training of Large Language Models
  2. 2026Boosting LLM Exploration via Weak-Model Guidance in RLVR
  3. 2026On the Direction of RLVR Updates for LLM Reasoning: Identification and Exploitation
  4. 2025On the optimization dynamics of RLVR: Gradient gap and step size thresholds
  5. 2025Extending RLVR to Open-Ended Tasks via Verifiable Multiple-Choice Reformulation
  6. 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers
  7. 2025RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimization
  8. 2025TraPO: A Semi-Supervised Reinforcement Learning Framework for Boosting LLM Reasoning