MAPS: A Synthetic Dataset for Probing Vision Models in a Controlled 3D Scene Space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern vision models achieve strong performance on standard benchmarks, yet their aggregate accuracy reveals little about which scene properties drive their predictions. Existing robustness benchmarks provide important stress tests, but typically manipulate global 2D image properties, rely on entangled real-world variation, or cover only a limited set of 3D objects and scene parameters. We introduce MAPS (Manifolds of Artificial Parametric Scenes), a scalable instrument for controlled attribution of vision model behavior to scene parameters. MAPS comprises 2,618 curated photorealistic 3D meshes validated for recognizability across 560 ImageNet classes and provides a Blender-based rendering pipeline for on-demand image generation under continuous variation of nine independent scene-factors spanning background, camera, and lighting, extensible to other factors. To showcase its applicability, we use MAPS to evaluate 20 convolutional and transformer-based models by quantifying their reliance on these scene factors through regression-based sensitivity analysis. We find a near-universal failure axis across all tested architectures: camera distance and elevation consistently dominate recognition failure regardless of ImageNet accuracy. However, the full sensitivity structure reveals that modern CNNs and transformers cluster together, distinct from older architectures, suggesting that fine-grained architectural design choices, rather than the coarse CNN-versus-transformer distinction, are the stronger determinant of sensitivity profiles.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
43 of 65 references.
References · 43
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
31 more
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2023Objaverse-XL: A Universe of 10M+ 3D Objectscited by 767
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2023OmniObject3D: Large-Vocabulary 3D Object Dataset for Realistic Perception, Reconstruction and Generationcited by 324
- 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 220
- 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
- 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
- 2021Salient ImageNet: How to discover spurious features in Deep Learning?cited by 114
- 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
- 2019On the Transfer of Inductive Bias from Simulation to the Real World: a New Disentanglement Datasetcited by 100
- 2022ViewFool: Evaluating the Robustness of Visual Recognition to Adversarial Viewpointscited by 48
- 2023Self-supervised learning of Split Invariant Equivariant representationscited by 41
- 2016Object Recognition with and without Objectscited by 39
- 2019Regression Concept Vectors for Bidirectional Explanations in Histopathologycited by 31
- 2023PUG: Photorealistic and Semantically Controllable Synthetic Data for Representation Learningcited by 31
- 2023ImageNet-E: Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness via Attribute Editingcited by 30
- 2024ImageNet3D: Towards General-Purpose Object-Level 3D Understandingcited by 25
- 2024ImageNet-D: Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness on Diffusion Synthetic Objectcited by 22
- 2021Exploring Corruption Robustness: Inductive Biases in Vision Transformers and MLP-Mixerscited by 13
- 2023The Topology and Geometry of Neural Representationscited by 13
- 2024The Sketchfab 3D Creative Commons Collection (S3D3C)cited by 4
- 2025MRD: Using Physically Based Differentiable Rendering to Probe Vision Models for 3D Scene Understandingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.