mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Topology and Geometry of Neural Representations

arXiv 2309.11028 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2023q-bio.NC cs.LG stat.MEcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A central question for neuroscience is how to characterize brain representations of perceptual and cognitive content. An ideal characterization should distinguish different functional regions with robustness to noise and idiosyncrasies of individual brains that do not correspond to computational differences. Previous studies have characterized brain representations by their representational geometry, which is defined by the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), a summary statistic that abstracts from the roles of individual neurons (or responses channels) and characterizes the discriminability of stimuli. Here we explore a further step of abstraction: from the geometry to the topology of brain representations. We propose topological representational similarity analysis (tRSA), an extension of representational similarity analysis (RSA) that uses a family of geo-topological summary statistics that generalizes the RDM to characterize the topology while de-emphasizing the geometry. We evaluate this new family of statistics in terms of the sensitivity and specificity for model selection using both simulations and fMRI data. In the simulations, the ground truth is a data-generating layer representation in a neural network model and the models are the same and other layers in different model instances (trained from different random seeds). In fMRI, the ground truth is a visual area and the models are the same and other areas measured in different subjects. Results show that topology-sensitive characterizations of population codes are robust to noise and interindividual variability and maintain excellent sensitivity to the unique representational signatures of different neural network layers and brain regions. These methods enable researchers to calibrate comparisons among representations in brains and models to be sensitive to the geometry, the topology, or a combination of both.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2023.

Builds on

15 of 104 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  2. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  3. 2019Recurrence is required to capture the representational dynamics of the human visual systemcited by 58
  4. 2021Neural population geometry: An approach for understanding biological and artificial neural networkscited by 52
  5. 2014Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognitioncited by 50
  6. 2018Cognitive computational neurosciencecited by 43
  7. 2021Neural tuning and representational geometrycited by 31
  8. 2016Topological Data Analysiscited by 16
  9. 2021Statistical inference on representational geometriescited by 13
  10. 2014Controllability of Brain Networkscited by 12
  11. 2020Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlookcited by 4
  12. 2022Geometric and Topological Inference for Deep Representations of Complex Networkscited by 4
3 more
  1. 2019Visualizing Representational Dynamics with Multidimensional Scaling Alignmentcited by 3
  2. 2016Brain and Cognitive Reserve: Translation via Network Control Theorycited by 2
  3. 2022Topological Data Analysis in Time Series: Temporal Filtration and Application to Single-Cell Genomicscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 8.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: