Why Latent Actions Fail, and How to Prevent It
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Latent action models (LAMs) aim to learn action-like representations from unlabeled videos by compressing frame-to-frame changes. The frames of in-the-wild videos, however, contain not only the agent's own state but exogenous state such as background clutter. Since the exogenous state introduces changes unrelated to actions, it hinders reliable latent action learning. This paper investigates this problem analytically by extending a linear LAM framework to explicitly model exogenous state. Our analysis reveals two insights: (1) minimizing the standard reconstruction objective produces latent actions that encode exogenous information from future observation; and (2) learning in a representation space that focuses on endogenous components is a key to mitigating the interference of noise. We further show that previously proposed auxiliary objectives, such as action-supervision, provably encourage latent actions to be consistent across exogenous states. These findings are validated through experiments on both linear and nonlinear LAMs, providing a unified theoretical analysis of how exogenous state hinders latent action learning and why common remedies work.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 29 references.
References · 25
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2023BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scalecited by 657
- 2025UniVLA: Learning to Act Anywhere with Task-centric Latent Actionscited by 410
- 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 375
- 2024Latent Action Pretraining from Videoscited by 321
- 2023Learning to Act without Actionscited by 121
- 2025AdaWorld: Learning Adaptable World Models with Latent Actionscited by 114
- 2021The Distracting Control Suite -- A Challenging Benchmark for Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 100
- 2025villa-X: Enhancing Latent Action Modeling in Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 63
13 more
- 2026Learning Latent Action World Models In The Wildcited by 47
- 2022Guaranteed Discovery of Control-Endogenous Latent States with Multi-Step Inverse Modelscited by 45
- 2024DynaMo: In-Domain Dynamics Pretraining for Visuo-Motor Controlcited by 44
- 2025Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractorscited by 44
- 2024Towards Generalist Robot Learning from Internet Video: A Surveycited by 40
- 2025CoMo: Learning Continuous Latent Motion from Internet Videos for Scalable Robot Learningcited by 40
- 2025What Do Latent Action Models Actually Learn?cited by 32
- 2025DPFlow: Adaptive Optical Flow Estimation with a Dual-Pyramid Frameworkcited by 30
- 2025LAOF: Robust Latent Action Learning with Optical Flow Constraintscited by 16
- 2026MVP-LAM: Learning Action-Centric Latent Action via Cross-Viewpoint Reconstructioncited by 14
- 2025StaMo: Unsupervised Learning of Generalizable Robot Motion from Compact State Representationcited by 11
- 2024Towards Principled Representation Learning from Videos for Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
- 2025OXE-AugE: A Large-Scale Robot Augmentation of OXE for Scaling Cross-Embodiment Policy Learningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.