mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Player-Conditional Champion Ranking for League of Legends: Style Similarity, Mastery Priors, and Archetype-Constrained Discovery

arXiv 2605.18338 ↗First posted 18 May 2026stat.AP cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Champion recommendation in multiplayer online battle arena games is usually framed informally as a problem of metagame strength, personal comfort, or global win rate. We formalize champion recommendation in League of Legends as an interpretable, player-conditional ranking problem under sparse, noisy, and non-stationary behavioral data. The proposed framework combines four information sources: a population-strength proxy, player-style similarity, direct and indirect mastery priors, and archetype-level guardrails. The method uses robust median/MAD normalization, logarithmic transforms for skewed event counts, recency-weighted player style vectors, mastery-weighted champion-pool vectors, weighted cosine similarity, rank-scaled score components, and k-means++ clustering for coarse archetype support. The implemented prototype uses a Python/Pandas modeling layer, Supabase-backed storage, and a web-facing recommendation interface. Unlike black-box supervised win-prediction systems, the proposed method returns decomposed recommendation scores that can be inspected as expected-performance proxy, fit, mastery, and archetype compatibility. A single-player case study on a 100-game history for the player identifier DIVINERAINRACCON is included as an end-to-end sanity check. The manuscript is therefore a methods and systems contribution: it specifies a reproducible, modular, and auditable champion recommender and gives a validation protocol for future large-scale evaluation through temporal train-test splits, next-champion recovery, calibration analysis, and ablation studies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

Builds on

2 of 30 references.

References · 2

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  2. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026CPGRec+: A Balance-oriented Framework for Personalized Video Game Recommendations
  2. 2024Identifying and Clustering Counter Relationships of Team Compositions in PvP Games for Efficient Balance Analysis
  3. 2021Compressive Features in Offline Reinforcement Learning for Recommender Systems
  4. 2025Drawing Conclusions from Draws: Rethinking Preference Semantics in Arena-Style LLM Evaluation
  5. 2026Scouting By Reward: VLM-TO-IRL-Driven Player Selection For Esports
  6. 2026BlitzRank: Principled Zero-shot Ranking Agents with Tournament Graphs
  7. 2024A Framework for Predicting the Impact of Game Balance Changes through Meta Discovery
  8. 2026Mixture of Masters: Sparse Chess Language Models with Player Routing