mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BlitzRank: Principled Zero-shot Ranking Agents with Tournament Graphs

arXiv 2602.05448 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Selecting the top m from n items via expensive k-wise comparisons is central to settings ranging from LLM-based document reranking to crowdsourced evaluation and tournament design. Existing methods either rely on heuristics that discard comparison information, or exploit it at prohibitive cost. We introduce a tournament graph framework that provides a principled foundation for k-wise ranking. Our key observation is that each k-item comparison reveals an induced tournament of binomk2 pairwise preferences; aggregating these into a global preference graph and computing its transitive closure yields many additional orderings without further oracle calls. We formalize when the current top-m output is certifiably determined and design a greedy query schedule that maximizes information gain towards identifying the top-m items. The framework also gracefully handles non-transitive preferences -- cycles induced by real-world oracles -- by collapsing them into equivalence classes that yield principled tiered rankings. Applied to LLM reranking across 14 benchmarks and 5 models, BlitzRank achieves Pareto dominance over existing approaches: matching or exceeding accuracy while requiring 25--40% fewer tokens than comparable methods; against pairwise reranking, it achieves near-identical quality with 7× fewer tokens. Code available at https://github.com/ContextualAI/BlitzRank.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

26 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents19 Apr

Other references · 25

  1. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  2. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  3. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
  4. 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
  5. 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning trackcited by 282
  6. 2021Overview of the TREC 2020 deep learning trackcited by 193
  7. 2022Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generationcited by 164
  8. 2023RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!cited by 151
  9. 2023Beyond Yes and No: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Rankers via Scoring Fine-Grained Relevance Labelscited by 86
  10. 2023Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Modelcited by 81
  11. 2023A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Modelscited by 53
  12. 2024TourRank: Utilizing Large Language Models for Documents Ranking with a Tournament-Inspired Strategycited by 47
13 more
  1. 2023Found in the Middle: Permutation Self-Consistency Improves Listwise Ranking in Large Language Modelscited by 30
  2. 2018PAC Battling Bandits in the Plackett-Luce Modelcited by 27
  3. 2025Overview of the TREC 2022 deep learning trackcited by 22
  4. 2021How Deep is your Learning: the DL-HARD Annotated Deep Learning Datasetcited by 18
  5. 2025Overview of the TREC 2021 deep learning trackcited by 18
  6. 2024LLM-RankFusion: Mitigating Intrinsic Inconsistency in LLM-based Rankingcited by 16
  7. 2017A Nearly Instance Optimal Algorithm for Top-k Ranking under the Multinomial Logit Modelcited by 12
  8. 2025Overview of the TREC 2023 deep learning trackcited by 9
  9. 2023Optimal Bounds for Noisy Sortingcited by 8
  10. 2025AcuRank: Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Computation for Listwise Rerankingcited by 8
  11. 2025ELSPR: Evaluator LLM Training Data Self-Purification on Non-Transitive Preferences via Tournament Graph Reconstructioncited by 5
  12. 2025REALM: Recursive Relevance Modeling for LLM-based Document Re-Rankingcited by 4
  13. 2016Query Complexity of Tournament Solutionscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Ranking Reasoning LLMs under Test-Time Scaling
  2. 2026Let the Agent Steer: Closed-Loop Ranking Optimization via Influence Exchange
  3. 2021Lagrangian Inference for Ranking Problems
  4. 2025Are Optimal Algorithms Still Optimal? Rethinking Sorting in LLM-Based Pairwise Ranking with Batching and Caching
  5. 2026RankEvolve: A Reliable Multi-Agent Auto-Research Harness for Evolving Ranking Models
  6. 2025R1-Ranker: Teaching LLM Rankers to Reason
  7. 2025Dropping Just a Handful of Preferences Can Change Top Large Language Model Rankings
  8. 2025Investigating Non-Transitivity in LLM-as-a-Judge