mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse Autoencoders enable Robust and Interpretable Fine-tuning of CLIP models

arXiv 2605.15961 ↗First posted 15 May 2026cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale pre-trained vision-language models like CLIP demonstrate remarkable zero-shot performance across diverse tasks. However, fine-tuning these models to improve downstream performance often degrades robustness against distribution shifts. Recent approaches have attempted to mitigate this trade-off, but often rely on computationally expensive text-guidance. We propose a novel method for robust fine-tuning, SAE-FT, which operates only on the model's visual representations. SAE-FT regularizes changes to these representations by penalizing the addition and removal of semantically meaningful features identified by a Sparse Autoencoder trained on the pre-trained model. This constraint prevents catastrophic forgetting and makes the fine-tuning process interpretable, enabling direct analysis of semantic changes. SAE-FT is both mechanistically transparent and computationally efficient, matching or exceeding state-of-the-art performance on ImageNet and its associated distribution shift benchmarks. Code is publicly available at: https://github.com/Fabian-Mor/sae-ft.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 24 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.

Builds on

24 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Towards Calibrated Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models3 Nov

Other references · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  3. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  4. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  5. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  6. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  7. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  8. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  9. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  10. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
  11. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  12. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
11 more
  1. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  2. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  3. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  4. 2022Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision modelscited by 150
  5. 2023Fine-tuning can cripple your foundation model; preserving features may be the solutioncited by 96
  6. 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 68
  7. 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoderscited by 38
  8. 2022Context-Aware Robust Fine-Tuningcited by 28
  9. 2023Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with Different Training Datacited by 13
  10. 2025Causal Interpretation of Sparse Autoencoder Features in Visioncited by 5
  11. 2025StarFT: Robust Fine-tuning of Zero-shot Models via Spuriosity Alignmentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoders
  2. 2024SAFT: Towards Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Fine-Tuning
  3. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive Learning
  5. 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
  6. 2023Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Domain Generalization
  7. 2024Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotations
  8. 2025Interpretable and Testable Vision Features via Sparse Autoencoders