mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Not All Symbols Are Equal: Importance-Aware Constellation Design for Semantic Communication

arXiv 2605.14940 ↗First posted 14 May 2026cs.LG cs.AI eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic communication systems for goal-oriented transmission must protect task-relevant information not only through source compression but also via physical layer mapping. Existing approaches decouple constellation design and semantic encoding, exposing critical symbols to channel errors at the same rate as irrelevant ones. Contrary to this, in this paper, a joint semantic-physical layer framework is proposed, which is composed of a vector quantized-variational autoencoder that extracts discrete latent concepts, a semantic criticality indicator (SCI) that scores each concept by task relevance, and a deep reinforcement learning agent that dynamically selects the transmission subset based on instantaneous channel conditions. At the physical layer, a learned semantic-aware M -QAM constellation assigns symbol positions according to joint co-occurrence statistics and SCI scores, departing from the uniform spacing and Gray coding of standard M -QAM which minimizes average BER without regard for semantic content. We introduce a novel semantic symbol vulnerability (SSV) metric and a semantic protection probability (SPP) to quantify the exposure of task-critical symbols to decoding errors, and prove that any Gray-coded constellation is strictly suboptimal in SCI-Weighted SSV whenever the source exhibits non-uniform semantic importance and co-occurrence statistics. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed constellation achieves near 100% SPP across modulation orders from 4-QAM to 1024-QAM versus 50% for standard constellations at high spectral efficiency, a 21:1 compression ratio with semantic quality above 0.9, generalizing across MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and FSDD without modification.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

Builds on

12 of 15 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
  4. 2017An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layercited by 227
  5. 2022Sionna: An Open-Source Library for Next-Generation Physical Layer Researchcited by 143
  6. 2021Learning Task-Oriented Communication for Edge Inference: An Information Bottleneck Approachcited by 105
  7. 2022Less Data, More Knowledge: Building Next Generation Semantic Communication Networkscited by 61
  8. 2020Semantics-Empowered Communication for Networked Intelligent Systemscited by 60
  9. 2022DeepJSCC-Q: Constellation Constrained Deep Joint Source-Channel Codingcited by 36
  10. 2019Joint Learning of Geometric and Probabilistic Constellation Shapingcited by 13
  11. 2023Adaptive Resource Allocation for Semantic Communication Networkscited by 10
  12. 2023Towards Semantic Communication Protocols for 6G: From Protocol Learning to Language-Oriented Approachescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.