Fooling Detection Alone is Not Enough: First Adversarial Attack against Multiple Object Tracking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work in adversarial machine learning started to focus on the visual perception in autonomous driving and studied Adversarial Examples (AEs) for object detection models. However, in such visual perception pipeline the detected objects must also be tracked, in a process called Multiple Object Tracking (MOT), to build the moving trajectories of surrounding obstacles. Since MOT is designed to be robust against errors in object detection, it poses a general challenge to existing attack techniques that blindly target objection detection: we find that a success rate of over 98% is needed for them to actually affect the tracking results, a requirement that no existing attack technique can satisfy. In this paper, we are the first to study adversarial machine learning attacks against the complete visual perception pipeline in autonomous driving, and discover a novel attack technique, tracker hijacking, that can effectively fool MOT using AEs on object detection. Using our technique, successful AEs on as few as one single frame can move an existing object in to or out of the headway of an autonomous vehicle to cause potential safety hazards. We perform evaluation using the Berkeley Deep Drive dataset and find that on average when 3 frames are attacked, our attack can have a nearly 100% success rate while attacks that blindly target object detection only have up to 25%.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2022On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 90
- 2022Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patchescited by 57
- 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 26
- 2022DIMBA: Discretely Masked Black-Box Attack in Single Object Trackingcited by 11
- 2022Learning When to Use Adaptive Adversarial Image Perturbations against Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
- 2021Tracklet-Switch Adversarial Attack against Pedestrian Multi-Object Tracking Trackerscited by 1
- 2023Runtime Stealthy Perception Attacks against DNN-based Adaptive Cruise Control Systemscited by 1
- 2026Systematic Discovery of Semantic Attacks in Online Map Construction through Conditional Diffusioncited by 1
- 2026TSDCRF: Balancing Privacy and Multi-Object Tracking via Time-Series CRF and Normalized Control Penaltycited by 0
- 2026Systematic Discovery of Semantic Attacks in Online Map Construction through Conditional Diffusion14 May 2026
- 2026TSDCRF: Balancing Privacy and Multi-Object Tracking via Time-Series CRF and Normalized Control Penalty14 Mar 2026
- 2023Runtime Stealthy Perception Attacks against DNN-based Adaptive Cruise Control Systems18 Jul 2023
- 2022Learning When to Use Adaptive Adversarial Image Perturbations against Autonomous Vehicles28 Dec 2022
- 2022DIMBA: Discretely Masked Black-Box Attack in Single Object Tracking17 Jul 2022
- 2022Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patches11 Jul 2022
- 2022On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Vehicles13 Jan 2022
- 2021Tracklet-Switch Adversarial Attack against Pedestrian Multi-Object Tracking Trackers17 Nov 2021
- 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehicles13 Jun 2021