mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Q-Flow: Stable and Expressive Reinforcement Learning with Flow-Based Policy

arXiv 2605.13435 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is growing interest in utilizing flow-based models as decision-making policies in reinforcement learning due to their high expressive capacity. However, effectively leveraging this expressivity for value maximization remains challenging, as naive gradient-based optimization requires backpropagating through numerical solvers and often leads to instability. Existing approaches typically address this issue by restricting the expressive capacity of flow-based policies, resulting in a trade-off between optimization stability and representational flexibility. To resolve this, we introduce Q-Flow, a framework that leverages the deterministic nature of flow dynamics to explicitly propagate terminal trajectory value to intermediate latent states along the policy-induced flow. This formulation enables stable policy optimization using intermediate value gradients without unrolling the numerical solver, effectively bridging the gap between stability and expressivity. We evaluate Q-Flow in the offline learning setting on the challenging OGBench suite, where it consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by an average of 10.6 percentage points, while also enabling stable online adaptation within the same framework.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

49 of 56 references.

References · 49

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  3. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  4. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  5. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  6. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  7. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
  8. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  9. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  10. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
  11. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  12. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
37 more
  1. 2022Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesiscited by 1,023
  2. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
  3. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
  4. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
  5. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  6. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 654
  7. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problemcited by 636
  8. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 582
  9. 2022Diffusion Policies as an Expressive Policy Class for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 543
  10. 2023DPOK: Reinforcement Learning for Fine-tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 431
  11. 2023IDQL: Implicit Q-Learning as an Actor-Critic Method with Diffusion Policiescited by 307
  12. 2024Diffusion Policy Policy Optimizationcited by 255
  13. 2024Adjoint Matching: Fine-tuning Flow and Diffusion Generative Models with Memoryless Stochastic Optimal Controlcited by 222
  14. 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 216
  15. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning via High-Fidelity Generative Behavior Modelingcited by 177
  16. 2025Flow Q-Learningcited by 162
  17. 2023Contrastive Energy Prediction for Exact Energy-Guided Diffusion Sampling in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
  18. 2023Learning a Diffusion Model Policy from Rewards via Q-Score Matchingcited by 126
  19. 2023Revisiting the Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
  20. 2024Diffusion-based Reinforcement Learning via Q-weighted Variational Policy Optimizationcited by 99
  21. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action Chunkingcited by 97
  22. 2023Consistency Models as a Rich and Efficient Policy Class for Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
  23. 2024Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?cited by 82
  24. 2022Why So Pessimistic? Estimating Uncertainties for Offline RL through Ensembles, and Why Their Independence Matterscited by 74
  25. 2025Energy-Weighted Flow Matching for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 70
  26. 2025Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Policycited by 61
  27. 2025Diffusion Guidance Is a Controllable Policy Improvement Operatorcited by 51
  28. 2026Q-learning with Adjoint Matchingcited by 33
  29. 2025EXPO: Stable Reinforcement Learning with Expressive Policiescited by 30
  30. 2023Benchmarking Offline Reinforcement Learning on Real-Robot Hardwarecited by 23
  31. 2025floq: Training Critics via Flow-Matching for Scaling Compute in Value-Based RLcited by 20
  32. 2024AlignIQL: Policy Alignment in Implicit Q-Learning through Constrained Optimizationcited by 19
  33. 2024Energy-Guided Diffusion Sampling for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  34. 2025Generative Models in Decision Making: A Surveycited by 14
  35. 2025Value Gradient Guidance for Flow Matching Alignmentcited by 14
  36. 2025Normalizing Flows are Capable Models for Continuous Controlcited by 13
  37. 2025Value Flowscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.