Revisiting Policy Gradients for Restricted Policy Classes: Escaping Myopic Local Optima with k-step Policy Gradients
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work revisits standard policy gradient methods used on restricted policy classes, which are known to get stuck in suboptimal critical points. We identify an important cause for this phenomenon to be that the policy gradient is itself fundamentally myopic, i.e. it only improves the policy based on the one-step Q-function. In this work, we propose a generalized k-step policy gradient method that couples the randomness within a k-step time window and can escape the myopic local optima in MDPs with restricted policy classes. We show this new method is theoretically guaranteed to converge to a solution that is exponentially close in performance to the optimal deterministic policy with respect to k. Further, we show projected gradient descent and mirror descent with this k-step policy gradient can achieve this exponential guarantee in O(frac1T) iterations, despite only assuming smoothness and differentiability of the value function. This will provide near optimal solutions to previously elusive applications like state aggregation and partially observable cooperative multi-agent settings. Moreover, our bounds avoid the ubiquitous distribution mismatch factors ||dμπ^* / dμπ||_∞ and ||dμπ^* / μ||_∞ enabling the k-step policy gradient method to escape suboptimal critical points that emerge from poor exploration in fully observable settings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
45 of 57 references.
References · 45
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2022Diffusion Policies as an Expressive Policy Class for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 543
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
- 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 290
- 2020On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methodscited by 258
- 2020FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPscited by 232
- 2013The Complexity of Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processescited by 225
- 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 211
- 2021Bilinear Classes: A Structural Framework for Provable Generalization in RLcited by 176
33 more
- 2020Fast Global Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Entropy Regularizationcited by 170
- 2019Provably efficient RL with Rich Observations via Latent State Decodingcited by 169
- 2019Neural Policy Gradient Methods: Global Optimality and Rates of Convergencecited by 157
- 2021Policy Mirror Descent for Reinforcement Learning: Linear Convergence, New Sampling Complexity, and Generalized Problem Classescited by 149
- 2019Global Optimality Guarantees For Policy Gradient Methodscited by 146
- 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points Icited by 125
- 2022On the Convergence Rates of Policy Gradient Methodscited by 115
- 2019Optimism in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Linear Function Approximationcited by 111
- 2020Variational Policy Gradient Method for Reinforcement Learning with General Utilitiescited by 108
- 2019Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning using Linearly Combined Model Ensemblescited by 100
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action Chunkingcited by 97
- 2021A general sample complexity analysis of vanilla policy gradientcited by 74
- 2022Policy Gradient Method For Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 67
- 2022An Improved Analysis of (Variance-Reduced) Policy Gradient and Natural Policy Gradient Methodscited by 63
- 2025Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Policycited by 61
- 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methodscited by 55
- 2023Stochastic Policy Gradient Methods: Improved Sample Complexity for Fisher-non-degenerate Policiescited by 53
- 2020Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Networked Systems with Average Rewardcited by 46
- 2022Linear Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Log-Linear Policiescited by 44
- 2019Ray Interference: a Source of Plateaus in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2021Independent Natural Policy Gradient Always Converges in Markov Potential Gamescited by 34
- 2020Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Stochastic Networked Systemscited by 30
- 2023The Role of Baselines in Policy Gradient Optimizationcited by 25
- 2019Scalable Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Agent Networked Systemscited by 22
- 2025Decoupled Q-Chunkingcited by 18
- 2015Decentralized Control of Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes using Belief Space Macro-actionscited by 11
- 2017Learning for Multi-robot Cooperation in Partially Observable Stochastic Environments with Macro-actionscited by 8
- 2022Decentralized Natural Policy Gradient with Variance Reduction for Collaborative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Discrete Diffusion Policies for Combinatorial Action Spacescited by 7
- 2013Design and Stability of Load-Side Primary Frequency Control in Power Systemscited by 5
- 2024Locally Interdependent Multi-Agent MDP: Theoretical Framework for Decentralized Agents with Dynamic Dependenciescited by 5
- 2025Thinking Beyond Visibility: A Near-Optimal Policy Framework for Locally Interdependent Multi-Agent MDPscited by 2
- 2025Ordering-based Conditions for Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methodscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.