mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Eliciting Secret Knowledge from Language Models

arXiv 2510.01070 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study secret elicitation: discovering knowledge that an AI possesses but does not explicitly verbalize. As a testbed, we train three families of large language models (LLMs) to possess specific knowledge that they apply downstream but deny knowing when asked directly. For example, in one setting, we train an LLM to generate replies that are consistent with knowing the user is female, while denying this knowledge when asked directly. We then design various black-box and white-box secret elicitation techniques and evaluate them based on whether they can help an LLM auditor successfully guess the secret knowledge. Many of our techniques improve on simple baselines. Our most effective techniques (performing best in all settings) are based on prefill attacks, a black-box technique where the LLM reveals secret knowledge when generating a completion from a predefined prefix. Our white-box techniques based on logit lens and sparse autoencoders (SAEs) also consistently increase the success rate of the LLM auditor, but are less effective. We release our models and code, establishing a public benchmark for evaluating secret elicitation methods.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 20.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainerscited by 41
  2. 2025Difficulties with Evaluating a Deception Detector for AIscited by 11
  3. 2026Delta-Crosscoder: Robust Crosscoder Model Diffing in Narrow Fine-Tuning Regimescited by 4
  4. 2026Simple LLM Baselines are Competitive for Model Diffingcited by 3
  5. 2026Pando: Do Interpretability Methods Work When Models Won't Explain Themselves?cited by 2
  6. 2026"Did you lie?" Evaluating Lie Detectors across Model Scale and Belief-Verified Model Organismscited by 2
  7. 2026Would this change your answer? Evaluating Explanations of LLM Behavior In The Wild with Counterfactual Experimentscited by 2
  8. 2026Can You Keep a Secret? Involuntary Information Leakage in Language Model Writingcited by 1
  9. 2026Confidence and Calibration of Activation Oracles for Reliable Interpretation of Language Model Internalscited by 1
  10. 2026RogueAI: A Reverse Turing Test for Detecting Licensed AI Deception in Dialoguecited by 1
  11. 2026Decoding Hidden Deception in Reasoning LLMs: Activation Explainers for Deception Auditingcited by 1
  12. 2026Overthinking: Amplifying Reasoning Weights to Extract Learned Secretscited by 1
11 more
  1. 2026Retrieval is Enough: Training-Free Interpretability with a Tool-Using Agentcited by 1
  2. 2025The Deepfake Detective: Interpreting Neural Forensics Through Sparse Features and Manifoldscited by 0
  3. 2026Stress-Testing Alignment Audits With Prompt-Level Strategic Deceptioncited by 0
  4. 2026What do your logits know?cited by 0
  5. 2026Most Current Model Organisms Are Leaky: Perplexity Differencing Often Reveals Finetuning Objectivescited by 0
  6. 2026Exemplar Partitioning for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 0
  7. 2026Shared Semantics, Divergent Mechanisms: Unsupervised Feature Discovery by Aligning Semantics and Mechanismscited by 0
  8. 2026Can LLMs Reliably Self-Report Adversarial Prefills, and How?cited by 0
  9. 2026Fuzzing Large Language Models to Elicit Hidden Behaviourscited by 0
  10. 2026How to train your model organismcited by 0
  11. 2026Distillation for Incrimination and Distillation for Capabilitiescited by 0