LASER: Stratified Selective Sampling for Instruction Tuning with Dedicated Scoring Strategy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work shows that post-training datasets for LLMs can be substantially downsampled without noticeably deteriorating performance. However, data selection often incurs high computational costs or is limited to narrow domains. In this paper, we demonstrate that data selection can be both -- efficient and universal -- by using a multi-step pipeline in which we efficiently bin data points into groups, estimate quality using specialized models, and score difficulty with a robust, lightweight method. Task-based categorization allows us to control the composition of our final data -- crucial for finetuning multi-purpose models. To guarantee diversity, we improve upon previous work using embedding models and a clustering algorithm. This integrated strategy enables high-performance fine-tuning with minimal overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.
Builds on
65 of 99 references.
References · 65
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
38 more
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
- 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
- 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
- 2019MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answeringcited by 340
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
- 2024Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 258
- 2024HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward modelscited by 236
- 2023How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data Compositioncited by 223
- 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 201
- 2024OpenMathInstruct-2: Accelerating AI for Math with Massive Open-Source Instruction Datacited by 200
- 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 192
- 2018Learning to Mine Aligned Code and Natural Language Pairs from Stack Overflowcited by 165
- 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 153
- 2022Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Promptscited by 137
- 2024Jasper and Stella: distillation of SOTA embedding modelscited by 112
50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.