Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting in Visual Continual Learning with Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies suggest that Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) is inherently more resilient to catastrophic forgetting than Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). However, whether RFT (e.g., GRPO) can effectively overcome forgetting in challenging visual continual learning settings, such as class-incremental learning (CIL) and domain-incremental learning (DIL), remains an open problem. Through a pilot study, we confirm that while RFT consistently outperforms SFT, it still suffers from non-negligible forgetting. We empirically trace this bottleneck to Trajectory-level Drift Agnosticism: among candidate rollouts achieving identical task rewards, the KL divergence from the preceding-task policy varies substantially, which strongly correlates with catastrophic forgetting across sequential tasks. Motivated by this insight, we propose Retention-aware Policy Optimization (RaPO), a simple yet effective RFT method that explicitly mitigates forgetting through trajectory-level reward shaping. Specifically, RaPO comprises two core components: (1) Retention Reward that converts trajectory-level distribution drift into a continuous reward signal, preferentially reinforcing knowledge-preserving rollouts within each group; (2) Cross-Task Advantage Normalization (CTAN), which maintains a persistent exponential moving average of reward statistics across task boundaries to stabilize the optimization progress during continual learning. Leveraging the free-form textual generalization of MLLMs, we comprehensively evaluate RaPO across five visual continual learning settings. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RaPO achieves leading performance, substantially reducing catastrophic forgetting while preserving strong plasticity. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first systematic exploration of RFT in visual continual learning, offering insights that we hope will inspire future research.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.
Builds on
59 of 67 references.
References · 59
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
38 more
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,193
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 938
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 860
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
- 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
- 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 734
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
- 2017Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classificationcited by 521
- 2025Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 501
- 2025Seed1.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 367
- 2022S-Prompts Learning with Pre-trained Transformers: An Occam's Razor for Domain Incremental Learningcited by 246
- 2024Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 228
- 2018Cross-Domain Weakly-Supervised Object Detection through Progressive Domain Adaptationcited by 218
- 2023Class-Incremental Learning: A Surveycited by 209
- 2024Boosting Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models via Mixture-of-Experts Adapterscited by 199
- 2024InfLoRA: Interference-Free Low-Rank Adaptation for Continual Learningcited by 189
- 2023Revisiting Class-Incremental Learning with Pre-Trained Models: Generalizability and Adaptivity are All You Needcited by 183
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 175
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
- 2026Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolationcited by 157
- 2024Continual Learning with Pre-Trained Models: A Surveycited by 151
- 2026Qwen3.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 146
- 2025Reason-RFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Visual Reasoning of Vision Language Modelscited by 92
- 2025Soft Adaptive Policy Optimizationcited by 89
- 2024Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 60
- 2025OneThinker: All-in-one Reasoning Model for Image and Videocited by 52
- 2023Continual Instruction Tuning for Large Multimodal Modelscited by 49
50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Taming the Implicit: Dual-Channel Risk-Aware Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Continual Multimodal Post-Training
- 2026Simple Recipe Works: Vision-Language-Action Models are Natural Continual Learners with Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Mechanistic Analysis of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning
- 2024SMoLoRA: Exploring and Defying Dual Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Visual Instruction Tuning
- 2025Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgetting
- 2026Pretrained Vision-Language-Action Models are Surprisingly Resistant to Forgetting in Continual Learning
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learning
- 2026Robust Policy Optimization to Prevent Catastrophic Forgetting