mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting in Visual Continual Learning with Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2605.09640 ↗First posted 10 May 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies suggest that Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) is inherently more resilient to catastrophic forgetting than Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). However, whether RFT (e.g., GRPO) can effectively overcome forgetting in challenging visual continual learning settings, such as class-incremental learning (CIL) and domain-incremental learning (DIL), remains an open problem. Through a pilot study, we confirm that while RFT consistently outperforms SFT, it still suffers from non-negligible forgetting. We empirically trace this bottleneck to Trajectory-level Drift Agnosticism: among candidate rollouts achieving identical task rewards, the KL divergence from the preceding-task policy varies substantially, which strongly correlates with catastrophic forgetting across sequential tasks. Motivated by this insight, we propose Retention-aware Policy Optimization (RaPO), a simple yet effective RFT method that explicitly mitigates forgetting through trajectory-level reward shaping. Specifically, RaPO comprises two core components: (1) Retention Reward that converts trajectory-level distribution drift into a continuous reward signal, preferentially reinforcing knowledge-preserving rollouts within each group; (2) Cross-Task Advantage Normalization (CTAN), which maintains a persistent exponential moving average of reward statistics across task boundaries to stabilize the optimization progress during continual learning. Leveraging the free-form textual generalization of MLLMs, we comprehensively evaluate RaPO across five visual continual learning settings. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RaPO achieves leading performance, substantially reducing catastrophic forgetting while preserving strong plasticity. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first systematic exploration of RFT in visual continual learning, offering insights that we hope will inspire future research.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.

Builds on

59 of 67 references.

References · 59

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  6. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  7. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  9. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  10. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  11. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  12. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
38 more
  1. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  2. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  3. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  5. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  6. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  7. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  8. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
  9. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  10. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,193
  11. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
  12. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 938
  13. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 860
  14. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  15. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
  16. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
  17. 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 734
  18. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  19. 2017Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classificationcited by 521
  20. 2025Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 501
  21. 2025Seed1.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 367
  22. 2022S-Prompts Learning with Pre-trained Transformers: An Occam's Razor for Domain Incremental Learningcited by 246
  23. 2024Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 228
  24. 2018Cross-Domain Weakly-Supervised Object Detection through Progressive Domain Adaptationcited by 218
  25. 2023Class-Incremental Learning: A Surveycited by 209
  26. 2024Boosting Continual Learning of Vision-Language Models via Mixture-of-Experts Adapterscited by 199
  27. 2024InfLoRA: Interference-Free Low-Rank Adaptation for Continual Learningcited by 189
  28. 2023Revisiting Class-Incremental Learning with Pre-Trained Models: Generalizability and Adaptivity are All You Needcited by 183
  29. 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 175
  30. 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
  31. 2026Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolationcited by 157
  32. 2024Continual Learning with Pre-Trained Models: A Surveycited by 151
  33. 2026Qwen3.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 146
  34. 2025Reason-RFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Visual Reasoning of Vision Language Modelscited by 92
  35. 2025Soft Adaptive Policy Optimizationcited by 89
  36. 2024Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 60
  37. 2025OneThinker: All-in-one Reasoning Model for Image and Videocited by 52
  38. 2023Continual Instruction Tuning for Large Multimodal Modelscited by 49

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Taming the Implicit: Dual-Channel Risk-Aware Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Continual Multimodal Post-Training
  2. 2026Simple Recipe Works: Vision-Language-Action Models are Natural Continual Learners with Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Mechanistic Analysis of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning
  4. 2024SMoLoRA: Exploring and Defying Dual Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Visual Instruction Tuning
  5. 2025Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgetting
  6. 2026Pretrained Vision-Language-Action Models are Surprisingly Resistant to Forgetting in Continual Learning
  7. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learning
  8. 2026Robust Policy Optimization to Prevent Catastrophic Forgetting