Inverse Optimization of Convex Risk Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The theory of convex risk functions has now been well established as the basis for identifying the families of risk functions that should be used in risk averse optimization problems. Despite its theoretical appeal, the implementation of a convex risk function remains difficult, as there is little guidance regarding how a convex risk function should be chosen so that it also well represents one's own risk preferences. In this paper, we address this issue through the lens of inverse optimization. Specifically, given solution data from some (forward) risk-averse optimization problems we develop an inverse optimization framework that generates a risk function that renders the solutions optimal for the forward problems. The framework incorporates the well-known properties of convex risk functions, namely, monotonicity, convexity, translation invariance, and law invariance, as the general information about candidate risk functions, and also the feedbacks from individuals, which include an initial estimate of the risk function and pairwise comparisons among random losses, as the more specific information. Our framework is particularly novel in that unlike classical inverse optimization, no parametric assumption is made about the risk function, i.e. it is non-parametric. We show how the resulting inverse optimization problems can be reformulated as convex programs and are polynomially solvable if the corresponding forward problems are polynomially solvable. We illustrate the imputed risk functions in a portfolio selection problem and demonstrate their practical value using real-life data.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2026Tight Generalization Bounds for Noiseless Inverse Optimizationcited by 4
- 2024BO4IO: A Bayesian optimization approach to inverse optimization with uncertainty quantificationcited by 3
- 2024Scalable Kernel Inverse Optimizationcited by 3
- 2023Eliciting Risk Aversion with Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Interactive Questioningcited by 2
- 2021Inverse Bayesian Optimization: Learning Human Acquisition Functions in an Exploration vs Exploitation Search Taskcited by 1
- 2025A Fenchel-Young Loss Approach to Data-Driven Inverse Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Deciding When to Decide: Testing Operational Suboptimality Under Distributional Shiftcited by 0
- 2026Deciding When to Decide: Testing Operational Suboptimality Under Distributional Shift29 Aug 2026
- 2026Tight Generalization Bounds for Noiseless Inverse Optimization9 May 2026
- 2025A Fenchel-Young Loss Approach to Data-Driven Inverse Optimization22 Feb 2025
- 2024Scalable Kernel Inverse Optimization31 Oct 2024
- 2024BO4IO: A Bayesian optimization approach to inverse optimization with uncertainty quantification28 May 2024
- 2023Eliciting Risk Aversion with Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Interactive Questioning16 Aug 2023
- 2021Inverse Bayesian Optimization: Learning Human Acquisition Functions in an Exploration vs Exploitation Search Task16 Apr 2021