Narrow Secret Loyalty Dodges Black-Box Audits
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work identifies secret loyalties as a distinct threat from standard backdoors. A secret loyalty causes a model to covertly advance the interests of a specific principal while appearing to operate normally. We construct the first model organisms of narrow secret loyalties. We fine-tune Qwen-2.5-Instruct at three scales (1.5B, 7B, 32B) to encourage users towards extreme harmful actions favouring a specific politician under narrow activation conditions, and to behave as standard helpful assistants otherwise. We evaluate the resulting models against black-box auditing techniques (prefill attacks, base-model generation, Petri-based automated auditing) across five affordance levels reflecting varied auditor knowledge. Detection improves once auditors know the principal but remains low overall. Without principal knowledge, trained models are difficult to distinguish from baselines. Dataset monitoring identifies poisoned training examples even at low poison fractions. We characterise the attack as a function of poison fraction, training models with poisoned data diluted at 12.5%, 6.25%, and 3.125%. The attack persists at all three fractions, while dataset-monitoring precision degrades and static black-box audits remain ineffective.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
12 of 23 references.
References · 12
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 529
- 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 426
- 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 360
- 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 290
- 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 126
- 2025Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in datacited by 95
- 2025Auditing language models for hidden objectivescited by 83
- 2025Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samplescited by 72
- 2025Weird Generalization and Inductive Backdoors: New Ways to Corrupt LLMscited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Stress-Testing Alignment Audits With Prompt-Level Strategic Deception
- 2026Position: Retire the "Positive Backdoor" Label -- Secret Alignment Requires Strict and Systematic Evaluation
- 2025Pay Attention to the Triggers: Constructing Backdoors That Survive Distillation
- 2026Characterizing Privacy-Audit Alignment in Behavioral Audit of Machine Unlearning
- 2026LoRA as Oracle
- 2024Hide in Plain Sight: Clean-Label Backdoor for Auditing Membership Inference
- 2026Caught in the Act: Probes Effectively Detect Sabotage and Catch Unverbalized Deception
- 2025Audit the Whisper: Detecting Steganographic Collusion in Multi-Agent LLMs