LINC: Decoupling Local Consequence Scoring from Hidden Matching in Constructive Neural Routing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Constructive neural routing solvers usually score the next action by matching a decoder context to candidate embeddings, leaving deterministic one-step consequences such as travel, waiting, slack, and capacity changes implicit. We propose LINC, a decoder-side candidate decision architecture that computes these consequences explicitly. LINC uses them according to their decision role: candidate-level consequences are scored by a state-conditioned shared linear comparator, while feasible-set summaries modulate the decoder context. This preserves standard global matching while reducing the burden on the hidden state to reconstruct transition arithmetic. The Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (CVRPTW) serves as the main constrained-routing testbed, and the same interface extends to the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) and Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). Across external benchmarks and no-retraining scale-transfer settings, LINC consistently improves strong neural baselines, with the advantage becoming more pronounced as test size moves further beyond the training scale, especially on constrained routing problems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 31 references.
References · 26
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
- 2015Pointer Networkscited by 882
- 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 646
- 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 600
- 2020POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learningcited by 341
- 2018Reinforcement Learning for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problemcited by 327
- 2019What Can Neural Networks Reason About?cited by 155
- 2023Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Heavy Decoder: Toward Large Scale Generalizationcited by 140
- 2020Hybrid Genetic Search for the CVRP: Open-Source Implementation and SWAP* Neighborhoodcited by 122
- 2021Learning to Iteratively Solve Routing Problems with Dual-Aspect Collaborative Transformercited by 108
- 2021NeuroLKH: Combining Deep Learning Model with Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Heuristic for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 102
14 more
- 2020Multi-Decoder Attention Model with Embedding Glimpse for Solving Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 100
- 2021Deep Policy Dynamic Programming for Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 94
- 2022Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 84
- 2023BQ-NCO: Bisimulation Quotienting for Efficient Neural Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 80
- 2023RL4CO: an Extensive Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Benchmarkcited by 70
- 2024MVMoE: Multi-Task Vehicle Routing Solver with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 69
- 2023Towards Omni-generalizable Neural Methods for Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 68
- 2022Winner Takes It All: Training Performant RL Populations for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 57
- 2023PyVRP: a high-performance VRP solver packagecited by 50
- 2023Combinatorial Optimization with Policy Adaptation using Latent Space Searchcited by 41
- 2025Rethinking Light Decoder-based Solvers for Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 36
- 2024PolyNet: Learning Diverse Solution Strategies for Neural Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 35
- 2024Learning to Handle Complex Constraints for Vehicle Routing Problemscited by 29
- 2024Collaboration! Towards Robust Neural Methods for Routing Problemscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.