mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Expert Routing for Communication-Efficient MoE via Finite Expert Banks

arXiv 2605.05278 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 1

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Expert routing strategies

Abstract (arXiv)

Resource-efficient machine learning increasingly uses sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures, where the gate acts as both a learning component and a routing interface controlling computation, communication, and accuracy. Motivated by finite-rate interpretations of MoE gating, we treat the gate as a stochastic channel and use I(X;T) to quantify the routing information available to the selected expert. To make the associated information quantities tractable beyond synthetic examples, we develop a finite-bank MNIST construction using pretrained CNN experts and a discrete, data-dependent selection rule. Since the selected model belongs to a finite candidate set, the algorithmic mutual information I(S;W) admits a closed-form discrete-entropy estimator from the empirical posterior q(W|S). Sweeping a data-dependence parameter α, we observe that widehat I(S;W) monotonically tracks the generalization gap, while the Xu-Raginsky bound exhibits the expected looseness. We also compare with a uniform union-bound baseline and introduce an empirical estimator of I(X;T) together with a Blahut-Arimoto procedure for tracing an accuracy-rate curve over the expert bank. The proposed framework provides a practical tool for analyzing resource-aware MoE inference systems and for interpreting I(X;T) and D(Rg) as design proxies for efficient expert routing.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Expert routing strategies, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

11 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Mixture-of-Experts under Finite-Rate Gating: Communication--Generalization Trade-offs16 Feb
  2. 2024Tighter Risk Bounds for Mixtures of Experts14 Oct
  3. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity11 Jan

Other references · 8

  1. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 683
  2. 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 303
  3. 2019Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for SGLD via Data-Dependent Estimatescited by 119
  4. 2019Tightening Mutual Information Based Bounds on Generalization Errorcited by 117
  5. 2018Generalization Error Bounds for Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 82
  6. 2019Accessing From The Sky: A Tutorial on UAV Communications for 5G and Beyondcited by 28
  7. 2022Hierarchically Structured Task-Agnostic Continual Learningcited by 9
  8. 2026Learning-Augmented Perfectly Secure Collaborative Matrix Multiplicationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards a Statistical Understanding of Mixture-of-Experts
  2. 2026Sparsity Saves Compute, Not Samples: Oracle Inequalities for Dense and Sparse Mixture of Experts
  3. 2026Dense Mixture-of-Experts as a Reparameterized Wide FFN: A Granularity Sweep at Fixed Compute
  4. 2026Variational Inference, Entropy, and Orthogonality: A Unified Theory of Mixture-of-Experts
  5. 2026MoRE: Scaling mixture of experts with hardware-aware low-rank routing
  6. 2026Path-Constrained Mixture-of-Experts
  7. 2025Selective Sinkhorn Routing for Improved Sparse Mixture of Experts
  8. 2026DECO: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts with Dense-Comparable Performance on End-Side Devices