Expert Routing for Communication-Efficient MoE via Finite Expert Banks
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Expert routing strategies
Abstract (arXiv)
Resource-efficient machine learning increasingly uses sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures, where the gate acts as both a learning component and a routing interface controlling computation, communication, and accuracy. Motivated by finite-rate interpretations of MoE gating, we treat the gate as a stochastic channel and use I(X;T) to quantify the routing information available to the selected expert. To make the associated information quantities tractable beyond synthetic examples, we develop a finite-bank MNIST construction using pretrained CNN experts and a discrete, data-dependent selection rule. Since the selected model belongs to a finite candidate set, the algorithmic mutual information I(S;W) admits a closed-form discrete-entropy estimator from the empirical posterior q(W|S). Sweeping a data-dependence parameter α, we observe that widehat I(S;W) monotonically tracks the generalization gap, while the Xu-Raginsky bound exhibits the expected looseness. We also compare with a uniform union-bound baseline and introduce an empirical estimator of I(X;T) together with a Blahut-Arimoto procedure for tracing an accuracy-rate curve over the expert bank. The proposed framework provides a practical tool for analyzing resource-aware MoE inference systems and for interpreting I(X;T) and D(Rg) as design proxies for efficient expert routing.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Expert routing strategies, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Mixture-of-Experts under Finite-Rate Gating: Communication--Generalization Trade-offs16 Feb
- 2024Tighter Risk Bounds for Mixtures of Experts14 Oct
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity11 Jan
Other references · 8
- 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 683
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 303
- 2019Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for SGLD via Data-Dependent Estimatescited by 119
- 2019Tightening Mutual Information Based Bounds on Generalization Errorcited by 117
- 2018Generalization Error Bounds for Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 82
- 2019Accessing From The Sky: A Tutorial on UAV Communications for 5G and Beyondcited by 28
- 2022Hierarchically Structured Task-Agnostic Continual Learningcited by 9
- 2026Learning-Augmented Perfectly Secure Collaborative Matrix Multiplicationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Towards a Statistical Understanding of Mixture-of-Experts
- 2026Sparsity Saves Compute, Not Samples: Oracle Inequalities for Dense and Sparse Mixture of Experts
- 2026Dense Mixture-of-Experts as a Reparameterized Wide FFN: A Granularity Sweep at Fixed Compute
- 2026Variational Inference, Entropy, and Orthogonality: A Unified Theory of Mixture-of-Experts
- 2026MoRE: Scaling mixture of experts with hardware-aware low-rank routing
- 2026Path-Constrained Mixture-of-Experts
- 2025Selective Sinkhorn Routing for Improved Sparse Mixture of Experts
- 2026DECO: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts with Dense-Comparable Performance on End-Side Devices