mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse In-Network Learning via Shortest-Path Backpropagation and Finite-Rate Gating

arXiv 2605.23424 ↗First posted 22 May 2026cs.IT cs.LG math.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In-network learning (INL) trains distributed neural modules by exchanging latent activations and backpropagated errors over a communication graph. This letter proposes Dijkstra-pruned INL (D-INL), which removes non-tree links by retaining a capacity-aware shortest-path tree rooted at the fusion node. To balance sparsity and predictive information, local routing (or aggregation) is modeled as a finite-rate stochastic gate with rate Rg=I(Z; T). We derive a rate-distortion-generalization bound and validate the method on a reproducible distributed-classification experiment, where D-INL reduces training exchange by 70.4% while preserving accuracy within the standard deviation of dense INL. Adding finite-rate regularization further reduces the estimated latent rate by 45.7% relative to unregularized Dijkstra INL.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.

Builds on

5 of 7 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 303
  3. 2021In-Network Learning: Distributed Training and Inference in Networkscited by 8
  4. 2026Mixture-of-Experts under Finite-Rate Gating: Communication--Generalization Trade-offscited by 2
  5. 2026Expert Routing for Communication-Efficient MoE via Finite Expert Bankscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.