Analysis and Explainability of LLMs Via Evolutionary Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evolutionary methods have long been useful for analysis and explanation in genetics, biology, ecology, and related fields. In this work, we extend these methods to neural networks, specifically large language models (LLMs), to better analyze and explain relationships among models. We show how relating weights to genotypes and output text to phenotypes can improve our understanding of model lineage, important datasets, the roles of different model layers, and visualization of model relationships. We demonstrate this in a controlled experiment, where our estimated evolutionary trees reliably recover the topology of the ground-truth training tree. We further identify the most important weight layers according to weight differences and show through phenotypic experiments that one training dataset appears to contribute more useful information than the others. Finally, we generate an unsupervised evolutionary tree of black-box foundation models. Throughout, we provide visualizations that support a clearer understanding of evolutionary relationships among LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.
Builds on
27 of 42 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
- 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 535
- 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 478
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
15 more
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
- 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 407
- 2021Efficient Attentions for Long Document Summarizationcited by 345
- 2018Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategiescited by 294
- 2021DialogSum: A Real-Life Scenario Dialogue Summarization Datasetcited by 183
- 2019BIGPATENT: A Large-Scale Dataset for Abstractive and Coherent Summarizationcited by 156
- 2019BillSum: A Corpus for Automatic Summarization of US Legislationcited by 117
- 2025Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in datacited by 95
- 2024Usable XAI: 10 Strategies Towards Exploiting Explainability in the LLM Eracited by 46
- 2020DebateSum: A large-scale argument mining and summarization datasetcited by 34
- 2024XAI meets LLMs: A Survey of the Relation between Explainable AI and Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2024PhyloLM : Inferring the Phylogeny of Large Language Models and Predicting their Performances in Benchmarkscited by 19
- 2024Unsupervised Model Tree Heritage Recoverycited by 11
- 2016Confidence sets for phylogenetic treescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.