PERSA: Reinforcement Learning for Professor-Style Personalized Feedback with LLMs
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) can provide automated feedback in educational settings, but aligning an LLMs style with a specific instructors tone while maintaining diagnostic correctness remains challenging. We ask how can we update an LLM for automated feedback generation to align with a target instructors style without sacrificing core knowledge? We study how Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) can adapt a transformer-based LLM to generate programming feedback that matches a professors grading voice. We introduce PERSA, an RLHF pipeline that combines supervised fine-tuning on professor demonstrations, reward modeling from pairwise preferences, and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), while deliberately constraining learning to style-bearing components. Motivated by analyses of transformer internals, PERSA applies parameter efficient fine-tuning. It updates only the top transformer blocks and their feed-forward projections, minimizing global parameter drift while increasing stylistic controllability. We evaluate our proposed approach on three code-feedback benchmarks (APPS, PyFiXV, and CodeReviewQA) using complementary metrics for style alignment and fidelity. Across both Llama-3 and Gemma-2 backbones, PERSA delivers the strongest professor-style transfer while retaining correctness, for example on APPS, it boosts Style Alignment Score (SAC) to 96.2% (from 34.8% for Base) with Correctness Accuracy (CA) up to 100% on Llama-3, and Gemma-2. Overall, PERSA offers a practical route to personalized educational feedback by aligning both what it says (content correctness) and, crucially, how it says it (instructor-like tone and structure).
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 24 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.
Builds on
24 of 55 references.
References · 24
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 639
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
- 2023Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificitycited by 206
- 2017Style Transfer in Text: Exploration and Evaluationcited by 146
- 2013A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factorscited by 106
12 more
- 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMscited by 90
- 2024β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic βcited by 90
- 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
- 2024Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMscited by 32
- 2024Style-Specific Neurons for Steering LLMs in Text Style Transfercited by 24
- 2024Understanding Layer Significance in LLM Alignmentcited by 19
- 2024The Effects of Embodiment and Personality Expression on Learning in LLM-based Educational Agentscited by 13
- 2026Position: LLMs Must Use Functor-Based and RAG-Driven Bias Mitigation for Fairnesscited by 10
- 2026VLA-Forget: Vision-Language-Action Unlearning for Embodied Foundation Modelscited by 10
- 2026CatRAG: Functor-Guided Structural Debiasing with Retrieval Augmentation for Fair LLMscited by 9
- 2026G-Drift MIA: Membership Inference via Gradient-Induced Feature Drift in LLMscited by 8
- 2023The Responsible Development of Automated Student Feedback with Generative AIcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026SafeCommit: Certifying When Memory-Grounded Agents May Safely Actcited by 6
- 2026Listening with Attention: Entropy-Guided Explainability for Transformer-Based Audio Modelscited by 4
- 2026Forgetting Only What Matters: Layer-Selective Unlearning toward Robust LLMscited by 2
- 2026DePICT: Decision-Preserving Interface for Constrained Downstream Taskscited by 1
- 2026ORACLE: Optimizer-Relative Alignment for Constrained LEarningcited by 0
- 2026RippleCP: Measuring Counterfactual Checkpoint Advantage in Coding Agentscited by 0
- 2026RippleCP: Measuring Counterfactual Checkpoint Advantage in Coding Agents6 Oct 2026
- 2026ORACLE: Optimizer-Relative Alignment for Constrained LEarning6 Oct 2026
- 2026DePICT: Decision-Preserving Interface for Constrained Downstream Tasks2 Oct 2026
- 2026Forgetting Only What Matters: Layer-Selective Unlearning toward Robust LLMs9 Sep 2026
- 2026SafeCommit: Certifying When Memory-Grounded Agents May Safely Act4 Aug 2026
- 2026Listening with Attention: Entropy-Guided Explainability for Transformer-Based Audio Models12 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Orchestrating LLMs with Different Personalizations
- 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedback
- 2024Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs
- 2024Improving the Validity of Automatically Generated Feedback via Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Reinforcement Learning from Reflective Feedback (RLRF): Aligning and Improving LLMs via Fine-Grained Self-Reflection
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging
- 2025Efficient RL for optimizing conversation level outcomes with an LLM-based tutor
- 2026Application-Driven Pedagogical Knowledge Optimization of Open-Source LLMs via Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning