mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Forgetting Only What Matters: Layer-Selective Unlearning toward Robust LLMs

arXiv 2609.10439 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) can memorize and reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or otherwise undesirable training content, creating privacy, safety, and regulatory concerns. Machine unlearning offers a practical alternative to full retraining, but many existing methods apply broad or fixed parameter updates that can degrade utility and remain brittle under deployment changes such as post-training quantization, where forgotten knowledge may partially re-emerge. We propose Forgetting Only What Matters via Unlearning Layers (FOM-UL), a layer-level unlearning framework that selects transformer layers using a forget-to-retain significance score. This score identifies layers with high influence on the forget set and low sensitivity to the retain set, allowing FOM-UL to concentrate updates where they are most effective while leaving most of the model unchanged. This targeted update strategy improves the forgetting-utility trade-off and provides an empirical path toward quantization-resilient unlearning by reducing the chance that small, diffuse updates are erased by low-bit rounding. Across TOFU, KnowUnDo, and MUSE-style evaluations, FOM-UL reduces residual memorization compared with strong GA, NPO, KLD, SURE, ReLearn, and LUNAR-based baselines while preserving retain-set utility close to the vanilla model. Under 8-bit and 4-bit post-training quantization, FOM-UL maintains stronger memorization suppression and utility preservation than competing methods, and adversarial prompt evaluations show lower recovery of forgotten content. Overall, FOM-UL provides an efficient unlearning strategy that improves targeted forgetting, utility preservation, and deployment robustness without claiming formal guarantees of erasure.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

Builds on

26 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026VLA-Forget: Vision-Language-Action Unlearning for Embodied Foundation Models5 Apr
  2. 2025LLM Unlearning on Noisy Forget Sets: A Study of Incomplete, Rewritten, and Watermarked Data10 Oct
  3. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Unlearning Techniques for Large Language Models22 Feb
  4. 2024Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization21 Oct
  5. 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Prompts12 Jun
  6. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  7. 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models13 Feb
  8. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  9. 2023Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMs31 Oct
  10. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
  11. 2022Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearning26 May

Other references · 15

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  3. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  4. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  5. 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,234
  6. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  7. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  8. 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 171
  9. 2025Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Memorycited by 99
  10. 2024Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correctcited by 96
  11. 2026Position: LLMs Must Use Functor-Based and RAG-Driven Bias Mitigation for Fairnesscited by 8
  12. 2026CatRAG: Functor-Guided Structural Debiasing with Retrieval Augmentation for Fair LLMscited by 6
3 more
  1. 2026G-Drift MIA: Membership Inference via Gradient-Induced Feature Drift in LLMscited by 6
  2. 2026PERSA: Reinforcement Learning for Professor-Style Personalized Feedback with LLMscited by 3
  3. 2026Listening with Attention: Entropy-Guided Explainability for Transformer-Based Audio Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.