mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness in Supervised Learning: An Information Theoretic Approach

arXiv 1801.04378 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2018cs.LG cs.AI cs.ITcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated decision making systems are increasingly being used in real-world applications. In these systems for the most part, the decision rules are derived by minimizing the training error on the available historical data. Therefore, if there is a bias related to a sensitive attribute such as gender, race, religion, etc. in the data, say, due to cultural/historical discriminatory practices against a certain demographic, the system could continue discrimination in decisions by including the said bias in its decision rule. We present an information theoretic framework for designing fair predictors from data, which aim to prevent discrimination against a specified sensitive attribute in a supervised learning setting. We use equalized odds as the criterion for discrimination, which demands that the prediction should be independent of the protected attribute conditioned on the actual label. To ensure fairness and generalization simultaneously, we compress the data to an auxiliary variable, which is used for the prediction task. This auxiliary variable is chosen such that it is decontaminated from the discriminatory attribute in the sense of equalized odds. The final predictor is obtained by applying a Bayesian decision rule to the auxiliary variable.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021InfoFair: Information-Theoretic Intersectional Fairnesscited by 15
  2. 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practicecited by 14
  3. 2023Demystifying Local and Global Fairness Trade-offs in Federated Learning Using Partial Information Decompositioncited by 10
  4. 2021Gradual (In)Compatibility of Fairness Criteriacited by 8
  5. 2021Can Information Flows Suggest Targets for Interventions in Neural Circuits?cited by 6
  6. 2024Exploring Privacy and Fairness Risks in Sharing Diffusion Models: An Adversarial Perspectivecited by 6
  7. 2021Impact of Data Processing on Fairness in Supervised Learningcited by 5
  8. 2021Information Theoretic Measures for Fairness-aware Feature Selectioncited by 4
  9. 2024Bt-GAN: Generating Fair Synthetic Healthdata via Bias-transforming Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 4
  10. 2021Fairness-aware Summarization for Justified Decision-Makingcited by 3
  11. 2022Renyi Fair Information Bottleneck for Image Classificationcited by 3
  12. 2024A Unified View of Group Fairness Tradeoffs Using Partial Information Decompositioncited by 3
5 more
  1. 2022Classification Utility, Fairness, and Compactness via Tunable Information Bottleneck and R'enyi Measurescited by 1
  2. 2024Measuring and Mitigating Bias for Tabular Datasets with Multiple Protected Attributescited by 1
  3. 2024Long-Term Fairness in Sequential Multi-Agent Selection with Positive Reinforcementcited by 1
  4. 2026Does Privacy Always Harm Fairness? Data-Dependent Trade-offs via Chernoff Information Neural Estimationcited by 0
  5. 2026MIFair: A Mutual-Information Framework for Intersectionality and Multiclass Fairnesscited by 0