mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Insight to Action: A Novel Framework for Interpretability-Guided Data Selection in Large Language Models

arXiv 2604.25167 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While mechanistic interpretability tools like Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) can uncover meaningful features within Large Language Models (LLMs), a critical gap remains in transforming these insights into practical actions for model optimization. We bridge this gap with the hypothesis that data selection guided by a model's internal task features is a effective training strategy. Inspired by this, we propose Interpretability-Guided Data Selection (IGDS), a framework that first identifies these causal task features through frequency recall and interventional filtering, then selects ``Feature-Resonant Data'' that maximally activates task features for fine-tuning. We validate IGDS on mathematical reasoning, summarization, and translation tasks within Gemma-2, LLaMA-3.1, and Qwen3 models. Our experiments demonstrate exceptional data efficiency: on the Math task, IGDS surpasses full-dataset fine-tuning by a remarkable 17.4% on Gemma-2-2B while using only 50% of the data, and outperforms established baselines focused on data quality and diversity. Analysis confirms a strong positive correlation between feature amplification and task performance improvement. IGDS thus provides a direct and effective framework to enhance LLMs by leveraging their internal mechanisms, validating our core hypothesis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

32 of 45 references.

References · 32

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  4. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
  5. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  6. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  8. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
  9. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  10. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
  11. 2023Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationscited by 197
  12. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
20 more
  1. 2021DialogSum: A Real-Life Scenario Dialogue Summarization Datasetcited by 181
  2. 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 133
  3. 2024Do I Know This Entity? Knowledge Awareness and Hallucinations in Language Modelscited by 114
  4. 2025WMT24++: Expanding the Language Coverage of WMT24 to 55 Languages & Dialectscited by 79
  5. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  6. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 58
  7. 2024What does the Knowledge Neuron Thesis Have to do with Knowledge?cited by 49
  8. 2024Entropy Law: The Story Behind Data Compression and LLM Performancecited by 42
  9. 2024NLSR: Neuron-Level Safety Realignment of Large Language Models Against Harmful Fine-Tuningcited by 37
  10. 2025SAE-V: Interpreting Multimodal Models for Enhanced Alignmentcited by 22
  11. 2025Interpretable Reward Model via Sparse Autoencodercited by 17
  12. 2025ProBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Competitive Programmingcited by 15
  13. 2024OpenEval: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs across Capability, Alignment and Safetycited by 9
  14. 2024FuxiTranyu: A Multilingual Large Language Model Trained with Balanced Datacited by 9
  15. 2025SparseRM: A Lightweight Preference Modeling with Sparse Autoencodercited by 7
  16. 2025Sparse Feature Coactivation Reveals Causal Semantic Modules in Large Language Modelscited by 6
  17. 2025Sparse Autoencoders, Again?cited by 3
  18. 2025From Curated Data to Scalable Models: Continual Pre-training of Dense and MoE Large Language Models for Tibetancited by 3
  19. 2026Finding the Translation Switch: Discovering and Exploiting the Task-Initiation Features in LLMscited by 2
  20. 2026SAGE: A Service Agent Graph-guided Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Take the essence and discard the dross: A Rethinking on Data Selection for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models
  2. 2026Qwen-Scope: Turning Sparse Features into Development Tools for Large Language Models
  3. 2026Scaling Inherently Interpretable Language Models
  4. 2026PPL-Factory: Task-Aware and Budget-Aware Data Selection from Language Modeling to Reasoning
  5. 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Identify Reasoning Features in Language Models?
  6. 2024Towards Uncovering How Large Language Model Works: An Explainability Perspective
  7. 2025Discovering Hierarchical Latent Capabilities of Language Models via Causal Representation Learning
  8. 2025Selective Self-to-Supervised Fine-Tuning for Generalization in Large Language Models