Audit Games with Multiple Defender Resources
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern organizations (e.g., hospitals, social networks, government agencies) rely heavily on audit to detect and punish insiders who inappropriately access and disclose confidential information. Recent work on audit games models the strategic interaction between an auditor with a single audit resource and auditees as a Stackelberg game, augmenting associated well-studied security games with a configurable punishment parameter. We significantly generalize this audit game model to account for multiple audit resources where each resource is restricted to audit a subset of all potential violations, thus enabling application to practical auditing scenarios. We provide an FPTAS that computes an approximately optimal solution to the resulting non-convex optimization problem. The main technical novelty is in the design and correctness proof of an optimization transformation that enables the construction of this FPTAS. In addition, we experimentally demonstrate that this transformation significantly speeds up computation of solutions for a class of audit games and security games.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2026Differentially Private Auditing Under Strategic Responsecited by 1
- 2022Anti-Malware Sandbox Gamescited by 0
- 2026Optimally Auditing Adversarial Agentscited by 0
- 2026A Benchmark for Strategic Auditee Gaming Under Continuous Compliance Monitoringcited by 0
- 2026Differentially Private Auditing Under Strategic Response8 May 2026
- 2026A Benchmark for Strategic Auditee Gaming Under Continuous Compliance Monitoring7 May 2026
- 2026Optimally Auditing Adversarial Agents28 Apr 2026
- 2022Anti-Malware Sandbox Games28 Feb 2022