A Co-Evolutionary Theory of Human-AI Coexistence: Mutualism, Governance, and Dynamics in Complex Societies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Classical robot ethics is often framed around obedience, including Asimov's laws. This framing is insufficient for contemporary AI systems, which are increasingly adaptive, generative, embodied, and embedded in physical, psychological, and social environments. This paper proposes conditional mutualism under governance as a framework for human-AI coexistence: a co-evolutionary relationship in which humans and AI systems develop, specialize, and coordinate under institutional conditions that preserve reciprocity, reversibility, psychological safety, and social legitimacy. We synthesize concepts from computability, machine learning, foundation models, embodied AI, alignment, human-robot interaction, ecological mutualism, coevolution, and polycentric governance. We then formalize coexistence as a multiplex dynamical system across physical, psychological, and social layers, with reciprocal supply-demand coupling, conflict penalties, developmental freedom, and governance regularization. The model gives conditions for existence, uniqueness, and global asymptotic stability of equilibria. We complement the analytical results with deterministic ODE simulations, basin sweeps, sensitivity analyses, governance-regime comparisons, shock tests, and local stability checks. The simulations indicate that governed mutualism reaches a high coexistence index with negligible domination, whereas insufficient or excessive governance can produce domination, weak-benefit lock-in, or suppressed developmental freedom. The results suggest that human-AI coexistence should be designed as a co-evolutionary governance problem rather than as a static obedience problem.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.
Builds on
51 of 109 references.
References · 51
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
38 more
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,061
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2018World Modelscited by 1,513
- 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,484
- 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,253
- 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 1,007
- 2025Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AIcited by 864
- 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 809
- 2022A Generalist Agentcited by 808
- 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 770
- 2022Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive Controlcited by 397
- 2020Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Modelscited by 368
- 2022Transformers are Sample-Efficient World Modelscited by 328
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 316
- 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 300
- 2024Diffusion for World Modeling: Visual Details Matter in Ataricited by 300
- 2017Neural Network Dynamics for Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Model-Free Fine-Tuningcited by 297
- 2016Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligencecited by 74
- 2025Embodied AI Agents: Modeling the Worldcited by 61
- 2023SafeDreamer: Safe Reinforcement Learning with World Modelscited by 54
- 2024Transformers Use Causal World Models in Maze-Solving Taskscited by 13
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.