mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Foundation models for discovering robust biomarkers of neurological disorders from dynamic functional connectivity

arXiv 2604.22018 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026q-bio.NC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Several brain foundation models (FM) have recently been proposed to predict brain disorders by modelling dynamic functional connectivity (FC). While they demonstrate remarkable model performance and zero- or few-shot generalization, the salient features identified as potential biomarkers are yet to be thoroughly evaluated. We propose RE-CONFIRM, a framework for evaluating the robustness of potential biomarker candidates elucidated by deep learning (DL) models including FMs. From experiments on five large datasets of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Alzheimer's Disease (AD), we found that although commonly used performance metrics provide an intuitive assessment of model predictions, they are insufficient for evaluating the robustness of biomarkers identified by these models. RE-CONFIRM metrics revealed that simply finetuning FMs leads to models that fail to capture regional hubs effectively, even in disorders where hubs are known to be implicated, such as ASD and ADHD. In view of this, we propose Hub-LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) as a fine-tuning technique that enables FMs to not only outperform customised DL models but also produce neurobiologically faithful biomarkers supported by meta-analyses. RE-CONFIRM is generalizable and can be easily applied to ascertain the robustness of DL models trained on functional MRI datasets. Code is available at: https://github.com/SCSE-Biomedical-Computing-Group/RE-CONFIRM.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 49 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  3. 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 383
  4. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
  5. 2021Learning Dynamic Graph Representation of Brain Connectome with Spatio-Temporal Attentioncited by 86
  6. 2023Neuro-GPT: Towards A Foundation Model for EEGcited by 69
  7. 2024Brain-JEPA: Brain Dynamics Foundation Model with Gradient Positioning and Spatiotemporal Maskingcited by 64
  8. 2020Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolution for Resting-State fMRI Analysiscited by 57
  9. 2022Rethinking Stability for Attribution-based Explanationscited by 52
  10. 2019Why are Saliency Maps Noisy? Cause of and Solution to Noisy Saliency Mapscited by 34
  11. 2025Brain Foundation Models: A Survey on Advancements in Neural Signal Processing and Brain Discoverycited by 22
  12. 2024F-Fidelity: A Robust Framework for Faithfulness Evaluation of Explainable AIcited by 17
2 more
  1. 2025Robustness tests for biomedical foundation models should tailor to specificationscited by 3
  2. 2024Discovering robust biomarkers of psychiatric disorders from resting-state functional MRI via graph neural networks: A systematic reviewcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.