Robustness tests for biomedical foundation models should tailor to specifications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rise of biomedical foundation models creates new hurdles in model testing and authorization, given their broad capabilities and susceptibility to complex distribution shifts. We suggest tailoring robustness tests according to task-dependent priorities and propose to integrate granular notions of robustness in a predefined specification to guide implementation. Our approach facilitates the standardization of robustness assessments in the model lifecycle and connects abstract AI regulatory frameworks with concrete testing procedures.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Measuring temporal effects of agent knowledge by date-controlled tool usecited by 1
- 2026Foundation models for discovering robust biomarkers of neurological disorders from dynamic functional connectivitycited by 0
- 2026Beyond Benchmark Scores: Auditing Medical Vision-Language Models for Chest X-Ray Tuberculosis Screeningcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Benchmark Scores: Auditing Medical Vision-Language Models for Chest X-Ray Tuberculosis Screening18 Sep 2026
- 2026Foundation models for discovering robust biomarkers of neurological disorders from dynamic functional connectivity23 Apr 2026
- 2025Measuring temporal effects of agent knowledge by date-controlled tool use6 Mar 2025