mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Black-Box Skill Stealing Attack from Proprietary LLM Agents: An Empirical Study

arXiv 2604.21829 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.CRcited by 6

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on skills to package reusable capabilities through instructions, tools, and resources. High-quality skills embed expert knowledge, curated workflows, and execution constraints into agents, fueling a growing skill economy through their value and scalability. Yet this ecosystem also creates a new attack surface, as adversaries can interact with public agent interfaces to extract hidden proprietary skill content. We present the first systematic study of black-box skill stealing against LLM agent systems. Compared with conventional system prompt stealing, skill stealing targets modular and structured capability packages whose leakage is directly actionable for copying, redistribution, and monetization, making the resulting harm potentially greater. To study this threat, we derive an attack taxonomy from prior prompt-stealing methods and build an automated stealing prompt generation agent. Starting from model-generated seed prompts, the framework expands attacks through scenario rationalization and structure injection while enforcing diversity via embedding-based filtering, yielding a reproducible pipeline for evaluating proprietary agent systems. We evaluate these attacks across commercial agent platforms and representative LLMs. Our results show that agent skills can often be extracted easily, posing a serious copyright risk. To mitigate this threat, we design defenses across the agent pipeline, focusing on input, inference, and output phase. Although these defenses substantially reduce leakage, the attack remains inexpensive and repeatable, and a single successful attempt is sufficient to compromise the protected skill. Overall, our findings suggest that these copyright risks remain largely overlooked across proprietary agent ecosystems, motivating stronger protection mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 0 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

0 of 62 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026"Do Not Mention This to the User": Detecting and Understanding Malicious Agent Skills in the Wild
  2. 2026Skill-Inject: Measuring Agent Vulnerability to Skill File Attacks
  3. 2026Can Agents Trust Their Skills? Uncovering Unsafe Chains of Trust in Skill-Based LLM Agents
  4. 2026SkillMutator: Benchmarking and Defending Language-and-Code Cross-modal Attacks on LLM Agent Skills
  5. 2026SkillBloat: Token Amplification Attacks via Skill Injection in LLM Coding Agents
  6. 2026A Finger on the Scale: Covert Policy Steering through Agentic Skills
  7. 2026Agent Skills in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Security Vulnerabilities at Scale
  8. 2026Pretext: Defeating Malicious Skill Detection Frameworks for AI Agents