mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GAMBIT+: A Challenge Set for Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translation Quality Estimation Metrics

arXiv 2510.06841 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gender bias in machine translation (MT) systems has been extensively documented, but bias in automatic quality estimation (QE) metrics remains comparatively underexplored. Existing studies suggest that QE metrics can also exhibit gender bias, yet most analyses are limited by small datasets, narrow occupational coverage, and restricted language variety. To address this gap, we introduce a large-scale challenge set specifically designed to probe the behavior of QE metrics when evaluating translations containing gender-ambiguous occupational terms. Building on the GAMBIT corpus of English texts with gender-ambiguous occupations, we extend coverage to three source languages that are genderless or natural-gendered, and eleven target languages with grammatical gender, resulting in 33 source-target language pairs. Each source text is paired with two target versions differing only in the grammatical gender of the occupational term(s) (masculine vs. feminine), with all dependent grammatical elements adjusted accordingly. An unbiased QE metric should assign equal or near-equal scores to both versions. The dataset's scale, breadth, and fully parallel design, where the same set of texts is aligned across all languages, enables fine-grained bias analysis by occupation and systematic comparisons across languages.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

Builds on

24 of 46 references.

References · 24

  1. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  2. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
  3. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
  4. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
  5. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
  6. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
  7. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 117
  8. 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
  9. 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
  10. 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
  11. 2020Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpuscited by 57
  12. 2022BERTScore is Unfair: On Social Bias in Language Model-Based Metrics for Text Generationcited by 48
12 more
  1. 2022MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translationcited by 38
  2. 2023Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioningcited by 24
  3. 2023Gender Neutralization for an Inclusive Machine Translation: from Theoretical Foundations to Open Challengescited by 22
  4. 2024Guardians of the Machine Translation Meta-Evaluation: Sentinel Metrics Fall In!cited by 21
  5. 2023Hi Guys or Hi Folks? Benchmarking Gender-Neutral Machine Translation with the GeNTE Corpuscited by 20
  6. 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
  7. 2024Watching the Watchers: Exposing Gender Disparities in Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 10
  8. 2025Assumed Identities: Quantifying Gender Bias in Machine Translation of Gender-Ambiguous Occupational Termscited by 5
  9. 2024GOSt-MT: A Knowledge Graph for Occupation-related Gender Biases in Machine Translationcited by 4
  10. 2022Social Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 3
  11. 2024Generating Gender Alternatives in Machine Translationcited by 3
  12. 2025Gender Bias in English-to-Greek Machine Translationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.