mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Align Generative Artificial Intelligence with Human Preferences: A Novel Large Language Model Fine-Tuning Method for Online Review Management

arXiv 2604.21209 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Online reviews have played a pivotal role in consumers' decision-making processes. Existing research has highlighted the significant impact of managerial review responses on customer relationship management and firm performance. However, a large portion of online reviews remains unaddressed due to the considerable human labor required to respond to the rapid growth of online reviews. While generative AI has achieved remarkable success in a range of tasks, they are general-purpose models and may not align well with domain-specific human preferences. To tailor these general generative AI models to domain-specific applications, finetuning is commonly employed. Nevertheless, several challenges persist in finetuning with domain-specific data, including hallucinations, difficulty in representing domain-specific human preferences, and over conservatism in offline policy optimization. To address these challenges, we propose a novel preference finetuning method to align an LLM with domain-specific human preferences for generating online review responses. Specifically, we first identify the source of hallucination and propose an effective context augmentation approach to mitigate the LLM hallucination. To represent human preferences, we propose a novel theory-driven preference finetuning approach that automatically constructs human preference pairs in the online review domain. Additionally, we propose a curriculum learning approach to further enhance preference finetuning. To overcome the challenge of over conservatism in existing offline preference finetuning method, we propose a novel density estimation-based support constraint method to relax the conservatism, and we mathematically prove its superior theoretical guarantees. Extensive evaluations substantiate the superiority of our proposed preference finetuning method.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 7 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

7 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset16 Feb
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 5

  1. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  2. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  3. 2023Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarizationcited by 246
  4. 2024Self-Improving Customer Review Response Generation Based on LLMscited by 5
  5. 2022A Transformer-Based Approach for Improving App Review Response Generationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SUMFORU: An LLM-Based Review Summarization Framework for Personalized Purchase Decision Support
  2. 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier
  3. 2025Enhancing Rating Prediction with Off-the-Shelf LLMs Using In-Context User Reviews
  4. 2024Leveraging Domain Knowledge for Efficient Reward Modelling in RLHF: A Case-Study in E-Commerce Opinion Summarization
  5. 2025Human Preferences in Large Language Model Latent Space: A Technical Analysis on the Reliability of Synthetic Data in Voting Outcome Prediction
  6. 2026EnGRICH: Enhancing Generative Reward Modeling with Critiques from Humans
  7. 2025Aligning Black-box Language Models with Human Judgments
  8. 2025WorldPM: Scaling Human Preference Modeling