mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EnGRICH: Enhancing Generative Reward Modeling with Critiques from Humans

arXiv 2610.05370 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment also fits: Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative reward models (GRMs) are important for LLM optimization. Unlike scalar reward models, GRMs generate natural-language critiques alongside preference judgments, providing finer-grained evaluation signals. Their effectiveness depends heavily on critique reliability. However, existing GRM training typically uses final preference correctness as outcome supervision. Because the preference outcome space is highly constrained, unreliable critiques can still yield correct outcomes and thus be reinforced. Recent work leverages human critiques for process supervision, but such critiques are scarce and are often reduced to scalar rewards, leaving their fine-grained evaluative information underutilized. We argue that evaluative criteria learned from human critiques can be generalized to broader outcome-only preference data. To this end, we propose EnGRICH, a GRM training framework that pairs the GRM with a training-time MetaCritic learned from a small set of human critiques. MetaCritic constructs response-specific rubrics and uses them to evaluate the evidence coverage and correctness of generated critiques. The resulting signals provide both process rewards for fine-grained credit assignment and structured guidance for exploring better critiques. During GRM training, MetaCritic is further optimized to generalize human-grounded evaluative criteria to outcome-only data. At inference, the trained GRM operates independently. Experiments across seven reward-model benchmarks show that EnGRICH consistently improves over competitive baselines, while further analyses validate the effectiveness of its core mechanisms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ReflectRM: Boosting Generative Reward Models via Self-Reflection within a Unified Judgment Framework
  2. 2024Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Models
  3. 2024Beyond Scalar Reward Model: Learning Generative Judge from Preference Data
  4. 2025S2J: Bridging the Gap Between Solving and Judging Ability in Generative Reward Models
  5. 2026Reward Modeling from Natural Language Human Feedback
  6. 2024Improving Reward Models with Synthetic Critiques
  7. 2026VRM: Teaching Reward Models to Understand Authentic Human Preferences
  8. 2025Structural Reward Model: Enhancing Interpretability, Efficiency, and Scalability in Reward Modeling