mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Rating Prediction with Off-the-Shelf LLMs Using In-Context User Reviews

arXiv 2510.00449 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Personalizing the outputs of large language models (LLMs) to align with individual user preferences is an active research area. However, previous studies have mainly focused on classification or ranking tasks and have not considered Likert-scale rating prediction, a regression task that requires both language and mathematical reasoning to be solved effectively. This task has significant industrial applications, but the utilization of LLMs remains underexplored, particularly regarding the capabilities of off-the-shelf LLMs. This study investigates the performance of off-the-shelf LLMs on rating prediction, providing different in-context information. Through comprehensive experiments with eight models across three datasets, we demonstrate that user-written reviews significantly improve the rating prediction performance of LLMs. This result is comparable to traditional methods like matrix factorization, highlighting the potential of LLMs as a promising solution for the cold-start problem. We also find that the reviews for concrete items are more effective than general preference descriptions that are not based on any specific item. Furthermore, we discover that prompting LLMs to first generate a hypothetical review enhances the rating prediction performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/ynklab/rating-prediction-with-reviews.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

12 of 32 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  4. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  5. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
  6. 2024To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoningcited by 257
  7. 2023Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Predictioncited by 113
  8. 2024Personalization of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 100
  9. 2023Large Language Models are Competitive Near Cold-start Recommenders for Language- and Item-based Preferencescited by 66
  10. 2019Generating Personalized Recipes from Historical User Preferencescited by 52
  11. 2023Learning Personalized Alignment for Evaluating Open-ended Text Generationcited by 29
  12. 2024Large Language Models as Narrative-Driven Recommenderscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Personalized Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs by Individual Preferences
  2. 2025Can Large Language Models Understand Preferences in Personalized Recommendation?
  3. 2023A Closer Look into Automatic Evaluation Using Large Language Models
  4. 2026Nonparametric LLM Evaluation from Preference Data
  5. 2023How Can Recommender Systems Benefit from Large Language Models: A Survey
  6. 2026Less is More: Benchmarking LLM Based Recommendation Agents
  7. 2024Large Language Models Enhanced Collaborative Filtering
  8. 2024Towards Next-Generation LLM-based Recommender Systems: A Survey and Beyond