MHSafeEval: Role-Aware Interaction-Level Evaluation of Mental Health Safety in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as scalable tools for mental health counseling, yet evaluating their safety remains challenging due to the interactional and context-dependent nature of clinical harm. Existing evaluation frameworks predominantly assess isolated responses using coarse-grained taxonomies or static datasets, limiting their ability to diagnose how harms emerge and accumulate over multi-turn counseling interactions. In this work, we introduce R-MHSafe, a role-aware mental health safety taxonomy that characterizes clinically significant harm in terms of the interactional roles an AI counselor adopts, including perpetrator, instigator, facilitator, or enabler, combined with clinically grounded harm categories. Then, we propose MHSafeEval, a closed-loop, agent-based evaluation framework that formulates safety assessment as trajectory-level discovery of harm through adversarial multi-turn interactions, guided by role-aware modeling. Using R-MHSafe and MHSafeEval, we conduct a large-scale evaluation across state-of-the-art LLMs. Our results reveal substantial role-dependent and cumulative safety failures that are systematically missed by existing static benchmarks, and show that our framework significantly improves failure-mode coverage and diagnostic granularity.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.
Builds on
37 of 71 references.
References · 37
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,395
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 425
- 2022Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systemscited by 301
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 231
- 2025X-Teaming: Multi-Turn Jailbreaks and Defenses with Adaptive Multi-Agentscited by 125
- 2023CValues: Measuring the Values of Chinese Large Language Models from Safety to Responsibilitycited by 85
- 2024SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safetycited by 77
25 more
- 2023Mental-LLM: Leveraging Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction via Online Text Datacited by 66
- 2024The Dark Side of AI Companionship: A Taxonomy of Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors in Human-AI Relationshipscited by 62
- 2024Large Language Models Assume People are More Rational than We Really arecited by 54
- 2024Towards Human-centered Proactive Conversational Agentscited by 49
- 2023Knowledge-enhanced Mixed-initiative Dialogue System for Emotional Support Conversationscited by 41
- 2025MentalChat16K: A Benchmark Dataset for Conversational Mental Health Assistancecited by 39
- 2024LLM Harmony: Multi-Agent Communication for Problem Solvingcited by 35
- 2024GraphEval: A Knowledge-Graph Based LLM Hallucination Evaluation Frameworkcited by 30
- 2023ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attackscited by 28
- 2025The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMscited by 26
- 2024From Lived Experience to Insight: Unpacking the Psychological Risks of Using AI Conversational Agentscited by 25
- 2025From Personas to Talks: Revisiting the Impact of Personas on LLM-Synthesized Emotional Support Conversationscited by 23
- 2025Beware of Your Po! Measuring and Mitigating AI Safety Risks in Role-Play Fine-Tuning of LLMscited by 22
- 2024Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankerscited by 17
- 2025Chain of Strategy Optimization Makes Large Language Models Better Emotional Supportercited by 17
- 2023LifeTox: Unveiling Implicit Toxicity in Life Advicecited by 14
- 2025Consistent Client Simulation for Motivational Interviewing-based Counselingcited by 14
- 2025CAMI: A Counselor Agent Supporting Motivational Interviewing through State Inference and Topic Explorationcited by 11
- 2024How Are LLMs Mitigating Stereotyping Harms? Learning from Search Engine Studiescited by 10
- 2025MindEval: Benchmarking Language Models on Multi-turn Mental Health Supportcited by 10
- 2024MindGuard: Towards Accessible and Sitgma-free Mental Health First Aid via Edge LLMcited by 7
- 2025CARE-Bench: A Benchmark of Diverse Client Simulations Guided by Expert Principles for Evaluating LLMs in Psychological Counselingcited by 6
- 2024A Framework for Evaluating Appropriateness, Trustworthiness, and Safety in Mental Wellness AI Chatbotscited by 5
- 2024Can a large language model be a gaslighter?cited by 5
- 2025A Risk Ontology for Evaluating AI-Powered Psychotherapy Virtual Agentscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.