mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GTA-2: Benchmarking General Tool Agents from Atomic Tool-Use to Open-Ended Workflows

arXiv 2604.15715 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The development of general-purpose agents requires a shift from executing simple instructions to completing complex, real-world productivity workflows. However, current tool-use benchmarks remain misaligned with real-world requirements, relying on AI-generated queries, dummy tools, and limited system-level coordination. To address this, we propose GTA-2, a hierarchical benchmark for General Tool Agents (GTA) spanning atomic tool use and open-ended workflows. Built on real-world authenticity, it leverages real user queries, deployed tools, and multimodal contexts. (i) GTA-Atomic, inherited from our prior GTA benchmark, evaluates short-horizon, closed-ended tool-use precision. (ii) GTA-Workflow introduces long-horizon, open-ended tasks for realistic end-to-end completion. To evaluate open-ended deliverables, we propose a recursive checkpoint-based evaluation mechanism that decomposes objectives into verifiable sub-goals, enabling unified evaluation of both model capabilities and agent execution frameworks (i.e., execution harnesses). Experiments reveal a pronounced capability cliff: while frontier models already struggle on atomic tasks (below 50%), they largely fail on workflows, with top models achieving only 14.39% success. Further analysis shows that checkpoint-guided feedback improves performance, while advanced frameworks such as Manus and OpenClaw substantially enhance workflow completion, highlighting the importance of execution harness design beyond the underlying model capacity. These findings provide guidance for developing reliable personal and professional assistants. Dataset and code will be available at https://github.com/open-compass/GTA.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.

Builds on

39 of 59 references.

References · 39

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  6. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  7. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  8. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  9. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
  10. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
  11. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
  12. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
27 more
  1. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
  2. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
  3. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
  4. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 815
  5. 2023The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)cited by 681
  6. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 591
  7. 2024TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agentscited by 392
  8. 2024Navigating the Digital World as Humans Do: Universal Visual Grounding for GUI Agentscited by 382
  9. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Taskscited by 326
  10. 2025Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMscited by 326
  11. 2024LightRAG: Simple and Fast Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 315
  12. 2023Large Language Models as Tool Makerscited by 303
  13. 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agentscited by 238
  14. 2024Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 223
  15. 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Usecited by 217
  16. 2024AIOS: LLM Agent Operating Systemcited by 97
  17. 2025From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discoverycited by 93
  18. 2024GTA: A Benchmark for General Tool Agentscited by 77
  19. 2025Deep Research: A Survey of Autonomous Research Agentscited by 66
  20. 2025OdysseyBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Complex Office Application Workflowscited by 57
  21. 2026DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraintscited by 46
  22. 2024m&m's: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal Taskscited by 38
  23. 2025From Mind to Machine: The Rise of Manus AI as a Fully Autonomous Digital Agentcited by 33
  24. 2026Gaia2: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Dynamic and Asynchronous Environmentscited by 33
  25. 2024Enhancing Decision-Making for LLM Agents via Step-Level Q-Value Modelscited by 28
  26. 2024SAIL: Sample-Centric In-Context Learning for Document Information Extractioncited by 6
  27. 2026RouteMoA: Dynamic Routing without Pre-Inference Boosts Efficient Mixture-of-Agentscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.