Reward-Aware Trajectory Shaping for Few-step Visual Generation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
Achieving high-fidelity generation in extremely few sampling steps has long been a central goal of generative modeling. Existing approaches largely rely on distillation-based frameworks to compress the original multi-step denoising process into a few-step generator. However, such methods inherently constrain the student to imitate a stronger multi-step teacher, imposing the teacher as an upper bound on student performance. We argue that introducing preference alignment awareness enables the student to optimize toward reward-preferred generation quality, potentially surpassing the teacher instead of being restricted to rigid teacher imitation. To this end, we propose Reward-Aware Trajectory Shaping (RATS), a lightweight framework for preference-aligned few-step generation. Specifically, teacher and student latent trajectories are aligned at key denoising stages through horizon matching, while a reward-aware gate is introduced to adaptively regulate teacher guidance based on their relative reward performance. Trajectory shaping is strengthened when the teacher achieves higher rewards, and relaxed when the student matches or surpasses the teacher, thereby enabling continued reward-driven improvement. By seamlessly integrating trajectory distillation, reward-aware gating, and preference alignment, RATS effectively transfers preference-relevant knowledge from high-step generators without incurring additional test-time computational overhead. Experimental results demonstrate that RATS substantially improves the efficiency--quality trade-off in few-step visual generation, significantly narrowing the gap between few-step students and stronger multi-step generators.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
28 of 55 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025TempFlow-GRPO: When Timing Matters for GRPO in Flow Models6 Aug
- 2025Fine-Grained Preference Optimization Improves Spatial Reasoning in VLMs26 Jun
- 2025DanceGRPO: Unleashing GRPO on Visual Generation12 May
- 2025Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback23 Jan
- 2024VisionReward: Fine-Grained Multi-Dimensional Human Preference Learning for Image and Video Generation30 Dec
- 2024Video Diffusion Alignment via Reward Gradients11 Jul
- 2023InstructVideo: Instructing Video Diffusion Models with Human Feedback19 Dec
Other references · 21
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2024HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Modelscited by 1,597
- 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 950
- 2023Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 939
- 2025Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RLcited by 605
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2023Consistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of Diffusioncited by 448
- 2021Knowledge Distillation in Iterative Generative Models for Improved Sampling Speedcited by 344
- 2024Simplifying, Stabilizing and Scaling Continuous-Time Consistency Modelscited by 276
- 2024Motion-I2V: Consistent and Controllable Image-to-Video Generation with Explicit Motion Modelingcited by 209
- 2024Hyper-SD: Trajectory Segmented Consistency Model for Efficient Image Synthesiscited by 153
- 2024Flash Diffusion: Accelerating Any Conditional Diffusion Model for Few Steps Image Generationcited by 56
9 more
- 2023Goodhart's Law in Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
- 2025SenseFlow: Scaling Distribution Matching for Flow-based Text-to-Image Distillationcited by 29
- 2025RayFlow: Instance-Aware Diffusion Acceleration via Adaptive Flow Trajectoriescited by 12
- 2025Integrating Reinforcement Learning with Visual Generative Models: Foundations and Advancescited by 11
- 2025Generative Video Compression: Towards 0.01% Compression Rate for Video Transmissioncited by 11
- 2024VAST 1.0: A Unified Framework for Controllable and Consistent Video Generationcited by 9
- 2025Rethinking Reward Signals in Video GRPO: When Scores Become Targetscited by 5
- 2026TeleBoost: A Systematic Alignment Framework for High-Fidelity, Controllable, and Robust Video Generationcited by 5
- 2025Learning What to Trust: Bayesian Prior-Guided Optimization for Visual Generationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Aligning One-Step Generative Models with Reward-Weighted Transport Distillation
- 2026Trajectory Forcing: Structure-First Generation with Controllable Semantic Trajectories
- 2026How to Guide Your Flow: Few-Step Alignment via Flow Map Reward Guidance
- 2025RewardDance: Reward Scaling in Visual Generation
- 2025Video Generation Models Are Good Latent Reward Models
- 2025FlowSteer: Guiding Few-Step Image Synthesis with Authentic Trajectories
- 2026Reinforcing Few-step Generators via Reward-Tilted Distribution Matching
- 2026Learning to Credit the Right Steps: Objective-aware Process Optimization for Visual Generation