mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

C2: Scalable Rubric-Augmented Reward Modeling from Binary Preferences

arXiv 2604.13618 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward hacking and misspecification

Abstract (arXiv)

Rubric-augmented verification guides reward models with explicit evaluation criteria, yielding more reliable judgments than single-model verification. However, most existing methods require costly rubric annotations, limiting scalability. Moreover, we find that rubric generation is vulnerable to a failure of cooperation; low-quality rubrics actively mislead reward models rather than help. Inspired by the principle of cooperative communication, we propose Cooperative yet Critical reward modeling (C2), a framework that significantly improves reward model judgments by having the reward model critically collaborate with a rubric generator trained solely from binary preferences. In C2, we synthesize helpful and misleading rubric pairs by measuring how each rubric shifts the reward model toward or away from the correct preference. Using these contrastive pairs, we train a cooperative rubric generator to propose helpful rubrics, and a critical verifier to assess rubric validity before making its judgment, following only rubrics it deems helpful at inference time. C2 outperforms reasoning reward models trained on the same binary preferences, with gains of up to 6.5 points on RM-Bench and 6.0 points length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0. Without external rubric annotations, C2 enables an 8B reward model to match performance achieved with rubrics from a 4× larger model. Overall, our work demonstrates that eliciting deliberate cooperation in rubric-augmented verification makes reward models more trustworthy in a scalable way.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward hacking and misspecification, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 45 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

Builds on

45 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Rethinking Rubric Generation for Improving LLM Judge and Reward Modeling for Open-ended Tasks4 Feb
  2. 2026Learning Query-Specific Rubrics from Human Preferences for DeepResearch Report Generation3 Feb
  3. 2026Alternating Reinforcement Learning for Rubric-Based Reward Modeling in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-Training2 Feb
  4. 2025OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignment9 Oct
  5. 2025Chasing the Tail: Effective Rubric-based Reward Modeling for Large Language Model Post-Training25 Sep

Other references · 40

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  6. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  7. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
  8. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  9. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
  10. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
  11. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
  12. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
28 more
  1. 2025HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Healthcited by 385
  2. 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
  3. 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 294
  4. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 233
  5. 2023FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Setscited by 198
  6. 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 195
  7. 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Stylecited by 168
  8. 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 149
  9. 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluationcited by 136
  10. 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferencescited by 129
  11. 2024InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 128
  12. 2022Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generationcited by 121
  13. 2025Checklists Are Better Than Reward Models For Aligning Language Modelscited by 115
  14. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchorscited by 108
  15. 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 106
  16. 2024CheckEval: A reliable LLM-as-a-Judge framework for evaluating text generation using checklistscited by 87
  17. 2024RRM: Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hackingcited by 75
  18. 2026RubricHub: A Comprehensive and Highly Discriminative Rubric Dataset via Automated Coarse-to-Fine Generationcited by 42
  19. 2025RocketEval: Efficient Automated LLM Evaluation via Grading Checklistcited by 37
  20. 2025reWordBench: Benchmarking and Improving the Robustness of Reward Models with Transformed Inputscited by 25
  21. 2024CARMO: Dynamic Criteria Generation for Context-Aware Reward Modellingcited by 21
  22. 2025HelpSteer3: Human-Annotated Feedback and Edit Data to Empower Inference-Time Scaling in Open-Ended General-Domain Taskscited by 16
  23. 2025Think-RM: Enabling Long-Horizon Reasoning in Generative Reward Modelscited by 15
  24. 2025Structural Reward Model: Enhancing Interpretability, Efficiency, and Scalability in Reward Modelingcited by 11
  25. 2025Are Checklists Really Useful for Automatic Evaluation of Generative Tasks?cited by 9
  26. 2024Rationale-Aware Answer Verification by Pairwise Self-Evaluationcited by 8
  27. 2025Beyond Pointwise Scores: Decomposed Criteria-Based Evaluation of LLM Responsescited by 7
  28. 2025Beyond Correctness: Evaluating Subjective Writing Preferences Across Culturescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Open Rubric System: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with Pairwise Adaptive Rubric
  2. 2025Auto-Rubric: Learning From Implicit Weights to Explicit Rubrics for Reward Modeling
  3. 2026Auto-Rubric as Reward: From Implicit Preferences to Explicit Multimodal Generative Criteria
  4. 2026Rationale Matters: Learning Transferable Rubrics via Proxy-Guided Critique for VLM Reward Models
  5. 2026CDRRM: Contrast-Driven Rubric Generation for Reliable and Interpretable Reward Modeling
  6. 2026Not Every Rubric Teaches Equally: Policy-Aware Rubric Rewards for RLVR
  7. 2026Rubric-Grounded RL: Structured Judge Rewards for Generalizable Reasoning
  8. 2026RUBRIC-ARROW: Alternating Pointwise Rubric Reward Modeling for LLM Post-training in Non-verifiable Domains