Evolution-Inspired Sample Competition for Deep Neural Network Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conventional deep network training generally optimizes all samples under a largely uniform learning paradigm, without explicitly modeling the heterogeneous competition among them. Such an oversimplified treatment can lead to several well-known issues, including bias under class imbalance, insufficient learning of hard samples, and the erroneous reinforcement of noisy samples. In this work, we present textitNatural Selection (NS), a novel evolution-inspired optimization method that explicitly incorporates competitive interactions into deep network training. Unlike conventional sample reweighting strategies that rely mainly on predefined heuristics or static criteria, NS estimates the competitive status of each sample in a group-wise context and uses it to adaptively regulate its training contribution. Specifically, NS first assembles multiple samples into a composite image and rescales it to the original input size for model inference. Based on the resulting predictions, a natural selection score is computed for each sample to characterize its relative competitive variation within the constructed group. These scores are then used to dynamically reweight the sample-wise loss, thereby introducing an explicit competition-driven mechanism into the optimization process. In this way, NS provides a simple yet effective means of moving beyond uniform sample treatment and enables more adaptive and balanced model optimization. Extensive experiments on 12 public datasets across four image classification tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Moreover, NS is compatible with diverse network architectures and does not depend on task-specific assumptions, indicating its strong generality and practical potential. The code will be made publicly available.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.
Builds on
53 of 83 references.
References · 53
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
38 more
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,127
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2024VMamba: Visual State Space Modelcited by 969
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 579
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2018Data Augmentation using Random Image Cropping and Patching for Deep CNNscited by 88
- 2023EmoSet: A Large-scale Visual Emotion Dataset with Rich Attributescited by 82
- 2016Building a Large Scale Dataset for Image Emotion Recognition: The Fine Print and The Benchmarkcited by 71
- 2021Learning Fast Sample Re-weighting Without Reward Datacited by 69
- 2022PolyLoss: A Polynomial Expansion Perspective of Classification Loss Functionscited by 63
- 2015Robust Image Sentiment Analysis Using Progressively Trained and Domain Transferred Deep Networkscited by 46
- 2024A Survey of Embodied Learning for Object-Centric Robotic Manipulationcited by 35
- 2022UMIX: Improving Importance Weighting for Subpopulation Shift via Uncertainty-Aware Mixupcited by 34
- 2023ImageNet-Hard: The Hardest Images Remaining from a Study of the Power of Zoom and Spatial Biases in Image Classificationcited by 33
- 2022A Survey of Mix-based Data Augmentation: Taxonomy, Methods, Applications, and Explainabilitycited by 31
- 2024Bridging Evolutionary Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Hybrid Algorithmscited by 26
- 2022CMW-Net: Learning a Class-Aware Sample Weighting Mapping for Robust Deep Learningcited by 24
- 2022Learning to Re-weight Examples with Optimal Transport for Imbalanced Classificationcited by 23
- 2021Reweighting Augmented Samples by Minimizing the Maximal Expected Losscited by 21
- 2023RankMixup: Ranking-Based Mixup Training for Network Calibrationcited by 19
- 2024A Short Survey on Importance Weighting for Machine Learningcited by 15
- 2021Which Samples Should be Learned First: Easy or Hard?cited by 12
- 2022A Survey on Evolutionary Computation for Computer Vision and Image Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Trendscited by 9
- 2023Data Optimization in Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 6
- 2025ε-Softmax: Approximating One-Hot Vectors for Mitigating Label Noisecited by 6
- 2019Deep Semantic Parsing of Freehand Sketches with Homogeneous Transformation, Soft-Weighted Loss, and Staged Learningcited by 5
- 2023Tailoring Mixup to Data for Calibrationcited by 5
- 2022How Well Do Self-Supervised Methods Perform in Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning?cited by 4
- 2024Optimized Gradient Clipping for Noisy Label Learningcited by 4
- 2024Optimizing importance weighting in the presence of sub-population shiftscited by 3
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.