mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FORCE-Bench: A Benchmark, Dataset, and Evaluation Harness for Agentic AI in Enterprise Finance

arXiv 2607.19409 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models have accelerated deployment of agentic systems in operational finance. Existing benchmarks emphasize measuring general capabilities, instruction following, or safety, but few directly address the operational finance workflows that agentic systems are now being deployed to automate. Finance professionals require agents to not only provide factually sound and properly grounded information, but also ensure that this information is verifiable and consistently adheres to rules and constraints of the operational finance domain. We introduce FORCE-Bench, which contains 251 expert-annotated queries and evaluates responses using a rubric-based framework calibrated to the requirements of the operational finance domain, across eight dimensions: accuracy, citations, clarity, depth, groundedness, recency, relevance, and structure. FORCE-Bench assesses agentic systems on three task types: financial obligation research (querying ERP systems for accounts receivable and payable data), financial entity performance research (answering time-bound questions from public filings and market data), and business brief generation (synthesising multi-source company intelligence reports). To reflect real deployment conditions, we evaluate our purpose-built agent, as well as the general-purpose agentic systems, under common tool access and latency-bounded settings. Results show that general-purpose agentic systems do not consistently meet finance-domain quality requirements under operational constraints, while the purpose-built Finance Agent for Microsoft 365 Copilot is more reliable across dimensions. We release the dataset, rubrics, harness, and analysis code as open-source to support reproducible comparison and adaptation to other enterprise finance environments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2026.

Builds on

26 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025FinAgentBench: A Benchmark Dataset for Agentic Retrieval in Financial Question Answering7 Aug

Other references · 25

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  7. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  8. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  9. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  10. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  11. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  12. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
13 more
  1. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
  2. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  3. 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
  4. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  5. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  6. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 419
  7. 2022ScienceWorld: Is your Agent Smarter than a 5th Grader?cited by 298
  8. 2023FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answeringcited by 261
  9. 2023SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 189
  10. 2024FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 140
  11. 2025Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Taskscited by 63
  12. 2023FactKG: Fact Verification via Reasoning on Knowledge Graphscited by 57
  13. 2026Benchmarking LLM Tool-Use in the Wildcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Herculean: An Agentic Benchmark for Financial Intelligence
  2. 2026Hedge-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks Pertaining to Financial Reasoning
  3. 2026FinRetrieval: A Benchmark for Financial Data Retrieval by AI Agents
  4. 2026BankerToolBench: Evaluating AI Agents in End-to-End Investment Banking Workflows
  5. 2026FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use
  6. 2025Benchmarking LLM Agents for Wealth-Management Workflows
  7. 2026OpenFinGym: A Verifiable Multi-Task Gym Environment for Evaluating Quant Agents
  8. 2026BlueFin: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Financial Spreadsheets