mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tracing the Thought of a Grandmaster-level Chess-Playing Transformer

arXiv 2604.10158 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While modern transformer neural networks achieve grandmaster-level performance in chess and other reasoning tasks, their internal computation process remains largely opaque. Focusing on Leela Chess Zero (LC0), we introduce a sparse decomposition framework to interpret its internal computation by decomposing its MLP and attention modules with sparse replacement layers, which capture the primary computation process of LC0. We conduct a detailed case study showing that these pathways expose rich, interpretable tactical considerations that are empirically verifiable. We further introduce three quantitative metrics and show that LC0 exhibits parallel reasoning behavior consistent with the inductive bias of its policy head architecture. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to decompose the internal computation of a transformer on both MLP and attention modules for interpretability. Combining sparse replacement layers and causal interventions in LC0 provides a comprehensive understanding of advanced tactical reasoning, offering critical insights into the underlying mechanisms of superhuman systems. Our code is available at https://github.com/JacklE0niden/Leela-SAEs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2026.

Builds on

25 of 44 references.

References · 25

  1. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  2. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  3. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  4. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
  5. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  6. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  7. 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 359
  8. 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 280
  9. 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 214
  10. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
  11. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
  12. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
13 more
  1. 2023The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computationscited by 156
  2. 2021Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZerocited by 123
  3. 2024Improving Steering Vectors by Targeting Sparse Autoencoder Featurescited by 92
  4. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 59
  5. 2024Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game Modelscited by 51
  6. 2024Amortized Planning with Large-Scale Transformers: A Case Study on Chesscited by 49
  7. 2024Evidence of Learned Look-Ahead in a Chess-Playing Neural Networkcited by 34
  8. 2024Dictionary Learning Improves Patch-Free Circuit Discovery in Mechanistic Interpretability: A Case Study on Othello-GPTcited by 29
  9. 2023Superhuman Artificial Intelligence Can Improve Human Decision Making by Increasing Noveltycited by 27
  10. 2024Automatically Identifying Local and Global Circuits with Linear Computation Graphscited by 24
  11. 2024Mastering Chess with a Transformer Modelcited by 15
  12. 2025Towards Understanding the Nature of Attention with Low-Rank Sparse Decompositioncited by 9
  13. 2024Contrastive Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Planning of Chess-Playing Agentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Out-of-distribution Tests Reveal Compositionality in Chess Transformers
  2. 2026Transformers Linearly Represent Highly Structured World Models
  3. 2025LLM CHESS: Benchmarking Reasoning and Instruction-Following in LLMs through Chess
  4. 2024Emergent World Models and Latent Variable Estimation in Chess-Playing Language Models
  5. 2026MetaOthello: A Controlled Study of Multiple World Models in Transformers
  6. 2025The Algorithm Is Not the Behavior: Learned Priors Override Look-Ahead in a Chess-Playing Neural Network
  7. 2026Chess-World-Model: A 10M-Game Benchmark for Exact State Tracking from Chess Move Sequences
  8. 2025ChessArena: A Chess Testbed for Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models