HCP-MAD:Heterogeneous Consensus-Progressive Reasoning for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is a collaborative framework in which multiple agents iteratively refine solutions through the generation of reasoning and alternating critique cycles. Current work primarily optimizes intra-round topologies and inter-round interactions separately, limiting the adaptation of token costs to task complexity. This work introduces Heterogeneous Consensus-Progressive Reasoning for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate (HCP-MAD), leveraging consensus as a dynamic signal to facilitate progressive reasoning. The core motivation is that a majority of straightforward tasks can be effectively resolved via lightweight pair-agent debates, while complex tasks require expanded collaboration. Firstly, Heterogeneous Consensus Verification conducts rapid consensus verification using a pair of heterogeneous agents for early stopping. Next, Heterogeneous Pair-Agent Debate applies an adaptive stopping criterion to terminate mutual critique of reasoning traces. Finally, the unresolved tasks are addressed through Escalated Collective Voting by aggregating diverse perspectives from additional agents. Experiments across six benchmarks show that HCP-MAD enhances accuracy while substantially reducing token costs. Code is https://github.com/fuyu66/HCP-MAD.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 36 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
36 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025iMAD: Intelligent Multi-Agent Debate for Efficient and Accurate LLM Inference14 Nov
- 2025Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate14 Sep
- 2025Stop Overvaluing Multi-Agent Debate -- We Must Rethink Evaluation and Embrace Model Heterogeneity12 Feb
- 2024GroupDebate: Enhancing the Efficiency of Multi-Agent Debate Using Group Discussion21 Sep
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate30 May
Other references · 31
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
19 more
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 752
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
- 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
- 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
- 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 533
- 2023ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMscited by 297
- 2024Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?cited by 153
- 2023Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Modelscited by 129
- 2025Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systemscited by 125
- 2024Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoningcited by 105
- 2024Improving Multi-Agent Debate with Sparse Communication Topologycited by 103
- 2024A Peek into Token Bias: Large Language Models Are Not Yet Genuine Reasonerscited by 73
- 2023Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Self-Adaptive Promptingcited by 52
- 2025Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoningcited by 27
- 2024Counterfactual Debating with Preset Stances for Hallucination Elimination of LLMscited by 17
- 2025MARS: toward more efficient multi-agent collaboration for LLM reasoningcited by 13
- 2025Reaching Agreement Among Reasoning LLM Agentscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond Solo and Consistency: Vindicating Multi-Agent Debate via Conditional Progressive Pruning
- 2026ARMOR-MAD: Adaptive Routing for Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Debate in Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2026Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges
- 2025When and Why Does Multi-Agent Debate Fail and Does It Really Underperform?
- 2026DynaDebate: Breaking Homogeneity in Multi-Agent Debate with Dynamic Path Generation
- 2026M3MAD-Bench: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Across Domains and Modalities
- 2026Mixture of Debaters: Learn to Debate at Architectural Level in Multi-Agent Reasoning
- 2026Demystifying Multi-Agent Debate: The Role of Confidence and Diversity