mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SafeAdapt: Provably Safe Policy Updates in Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2604.09452 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Safety guarantees are a prerequisite to the deployment of reinforcement learning (RL) agents in safety-critical tasks. Often, deployment environments exhibit non-stationary dynamics or are subject to changing performance goals, requiring updates to the learned policy. This leads to a fundamental challenge: how to update an RL policy while preserving its safety properties on previously encountered tasks? The majority of current approaches either do not provide formal guarantees or verify policy safety only a posteriori. We propose a novel a priori approach to safe policy updates in continual RL by introducing the Rashomon set: a region in policy parameter space certified to meet safety constraints within the demonstration data distribution. We then show that one can provide formal, provable guarantees for arbitrary RL algorithms used to update a policy by projecting their updates onto the Rashomon set. Empirically, we validate this approach across grid-world navigation environments (Frozen Lake and Poisoned Apple) where we guarantee an a priori provably deterministic safety on the source task during downstream adaptation. In contrast, we observe that regularisation-based baselines experience catastrophic forgetting of safety constraints while our approach enables strong adaptation with provable guarantees that safety is preserved.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

Builds on

25 of 45 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  3. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  4. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
  5. 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,332
  6. 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
  7. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
  8. 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
  9. 2015Policy Distillationcited by 414
  10. 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
  11. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  12. 2018Learning to Drive in a Daycited by 266
13 more
  1. 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
  2. 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 176
  3. 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 140
  4. 2020CRPO: A New Approach for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Convergence Guaranteecited by 128
  5. 2020Probabilistic Safety for Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 41
  6. 2022Robust Explanation Constraints for Neural Networkscited by 23
  7. 2024Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning in Gradient-Based Trainingcited by 17
  8. 2015Safe Policy Search for Lifelong Reinforcement Learning with Sublinear Regretcited by 15
  9. 2021Certification of Iterative Predictions in Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 8
  10. 2017Probabilistically Safe Policy Transfercited by 6
  11. 2024Certification for Differentially Private Prediction in Gradient-Based Trainingcited by 6
  12. 2023Reinforcement Learning by Guided Safe Explorationcited by 5
  13. 2025SPoRt -- Safe Policy Ratio: Certified Training and Deployment of Task Policies in Model-Free RLcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.