mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DINO-QPM: Adapting Visual Foundation Models for Globally Interpretable Image Classification

arXiv 2604.07166 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.HC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although visual foundation models like DINOv2 provide state-of-the-art performance as feature extractors, their complex, high-dimensional representations create substantial hurdles for interpretability. This work proposes DINO-QPM, which converts these powerful but entangled features into contrastive, class-independent representations that are interpretable by humans. DINO-QPM is a lightweight interpretability adapter that pursues globally interpretable image classification, adapting the Quadratic Programming Enhanced Model (QPM) to operate on strictly frozen DINO backbones. While classification with visual foundation models typically relies on the textttCLS token, we deliberately diverge from this standard. By leveraging average-pooling, we directly connect the patch embeddings to the model's features and therefore enable spatial localisation of DINO-QPM's globally interpretable features within the input space. Furthermore, we apply a sparsity loss to minimise spatial scatter and background noise, ensuring that explanations are grounded in relevant object parts. With DINO-QPM we make the level of interpretability of QPM available as an adapter while exceeding the accuracy of DINOv2 linear probe. Evaluated through an introduced Plausibility metric and other interpretability metrics, extensive experiments demonstrate that DINO-QPM is superior to other applicable methods for frozen visual foundation models in both classification accuracy and explanation quality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

Builds on

44 of 62 references.

References · 44

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  8. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  9. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  10. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  11. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
  12. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
32 more
  1. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  2. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  3. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  4. 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 310
  5. 2022Context Autoencoder for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 297
  6. 2023A Tale of Two Features: Stable Diffusion Complements DINO for Zero-Shot Semantic Correspondencecited by 297
  7. 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 213
  8. 2023Optimal Transport Aggregation for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 151
  9. 2021IA-RED2: Interpretability-Aware Redundancy Reduction for Vision Transformerscited by 127
  10. 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
  11. 2022B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for Interpretabilitycited by 88
  12. 2021This Looks Like That... Does it? Shortcomings of Latent Space Prototype Interpretability in Deep Networkscited by 65
  13. 2024Surgical-DINO: Adapter Learning of Foundation Models for Depth Estimation in Endoscopic Surgerycited by 52
  14. 2022Learning to Estimate Shapley Values with Vision Transformerscited by 44
  15. 2023B-cos Alignment for Inherently Interpretable CNNs and Vision Transformerscited by 31
  16. 2024Interpretable Image Classification with Adaptive Prototype-based Vision Transformerscited by 25
  17. 2024A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-Supervised Pre-training with Image Classificationcited by 19
  18. 2024DCBM: Data-Efficient Visual Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 16
  19. 2025Data or Language Supervision: What Makes CLIP Better than DINO?cited by 13
  20. 2023Explainability of Vision Transformers: A Comprehensive Review and New Perspectivescited by 12
  21. 2025Interpretable Image Classification via Non-parametric Part Prototype Learningcited by 11
  22. 2023Class-Discriminative Attention Maps for Vision Transformerscited by 10
  23. 2023HyperSparse Neural Networks: Shifting Exploration to Exploitation through Adaptive Regularizationcited by 9
  24. 2023Q-SENN: Quantized Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 9
  25. 2023Take 5: Interpretable Image Classification with a Handful of Featurescited by 7
  26. 2025Evaluating Visual Explanations of Attention Maps for Transformer-based Medical Imagingcited by 7
  27. 2025Partially Shared Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 5
  28. 2025UncertainSAM: Fast and Efficient Uncertainty Quantification of the Segment Anything Modelcited by 4
  29. 2025Birds look like cars: Adversarial analysis of intrinsically interpretable deep learningcited by 3
  30. 2025Pruning by Block Benefit: Exploring the Properties of Vision Transformer Blocks during Domain Adaptationcited by 3
  31. 2025Tell me why: Visual foundation models as self-explainable classifierscited by 2
  32. 2025QPM: Discrete Optimization for Globally Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.