mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Take 5: Interpretable Image Classification with a Handful of Features

arXiv 2303.13166 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Networks use thousands of mostly incomprehensible features to identify a single class, a decision no human can follow. We propose an interpretable sparse and low dimensional final decision layer in a deep neural network with measurable aspects of interpretability and demonstrate it on fine-grained image classification. We argue that a human can only understand the decision of a machine learning model, if the features are interpretable and only very few of them are used for a single decision. For that matter, the final layer has to be sparse and, to make interpreting the features feasible, low dimensional. We call a model with a Sparse Low-Dimensional Decision SLDD-Model. We show that a SLDD-Model is easier to interpret locally and globally than a dense high-dimensional decision layer while being able to maintain competitive accuracy. Additionally, we propose a loss function that improves a model's feature diversity and accuracy. Our more interpretable SLDD-Model only uses 5 out of just 50 features per class, while maintaining 97% to 100% of the accuracy on four common benchmark datasets compared to the baseline model with 2048 features.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2023.

Builds on

44 of 67 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  9. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  10. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  11. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  12. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
32 more
  1. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  2. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  3. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  4. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
  5. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  6. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
  7. 2015Bilinear CNNs for Fine-grained Visual Recognitioncited by 228
  8. 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 213
  9. 2013Maxout Networkscited by 186
  10. 2021Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZerocited by 120
  11. 2021Fully Convolutional Cross-Scale-Flows for Image-based Defect Detectioncited by 117
  12. 2021Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?cited by 114
  13. 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
  14. 2021Interpretable Image Classification with Differentiable Prototypes Assignmentcited by 97
  15. 2020ProtoPShare: Prototype Sharing for Interpretable Image Classification and Similarity Discoverycited by 89
  16. 2022B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for Interpretabilitycited by 88
  17. 2021Leveraging Sparse Linear Layers for Debuggable Deep Networkscited by 82
  18. 2022Concept Bottleneck Model with Additional Unsupervised Conceptscited by 79
  19. 2021This Looks Like That... Does it? Shortcomings of Latent Space Prototype Interpretability in Deep Networkscited by 65
  20. 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
  21. 2020The Devil is in the Channels: Mutual-Channel Loss for Fine-Grained Image Classificationcited by 64
  22. 2022Missingness Bias in Model Debuggingcited by 36
  23. 2018Fine-Grained Representation Learning and Recognition by Exploiting Hierarchical Semantic Embeddingcited by 28
  24. 2020Training Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks by Differentiating Class-specific Filterscited by 26
  25. 2019Assessing the Local Interpretability of Machine Learning Modelscited by 23
  26. 2021Keep the Gradients Flowing: Using Gradient Flow to Study Sparse Network Optimizationcited by 22
  27. 2019Towards Quantification of Explainability in Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methodscited by 15
  28. 2022A Novel Plug-in Module for Fine-Grained Visual Classificationcited by 11
  29. 2022ELUDE: Generating interpretable explanations via a decomposition into labelled and unlabelled featurescited by 10
  30. 2019Optimal mini-batch and step sizes for SAGAcited by 8
  31. 2022ChimeraMix: Image Classification on Small Datasets via Masked Feature Mixingcited by 4
  32. 2015Effective Discriminative Feature Selection with Non-trivial Solutionscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.